Separated out of CL:1513058 to make it possible to land parts
individually while the affected crate has no other significant CLs
pending. This avoids repeatedly introducing non-textual conflicts with
new code that adds `use` statements.
TEST=cargo check
TEST=cargo check --all-features
TEST=cargo check --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Change-Id: I6d541d6d51498612c82072c64cb78eefcb2abb8c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1519700
Commit-Ready: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
This is an easy step toward adopting 2018 edition eventually, and will
make any future CL that sets `edition = "2018"` this much smaller.
The module system changes in Rust 2018 are described here:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/edition-guide/rust-2018/module-system/path-clarity.html
Generated by running:
cargo fix --edition --all
in each workspace, followed by bin/fmt.
TEST=cargo check
TEST=cargo check --all-features
TEST=cargo check --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Change-Id: I000ab5e69d69aa222c272fae899464bbaf65f6d8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1513054
Commit-Ready: ChromeOS CL Exonerator Bot <chromiumos-cl-exonerator@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Tested-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Rustfmt currently does not touch the content of macro invocations. Also
it used to have a bug where if it changed indentation of a block of code
containing a multi-line macro invocation then the macro input would not
get correspondingly indented. That bug was visible across some of the
code here.
For example:
// rustfmt decides to un-indent the surrounding block:
let data_size_in_bytes = quote!(
( #( #field_types::FIELD_WIDTH as usize )+* ) / 8
);
// poorly formatted resulting code:
let data_size_in_bytes = quote!(
( #( #field_types::FIELD_WIDTH as usize )+* ) / 8
);
// should have been:
let data_size_in_bytes = quote!(
( #( #field_types::FIELD_WIDTH as usize )+* ) / 8
);
TEST=cargo check crosvm
TEST=cargo test each of the three proc-macro crates
CQ-DEPEND=CL:1338507
Change-Id: Id2d456a8d85d719fbc0a65624f153f0f9df6f500
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1338508
Commit-Ready: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chirantan Ekbote <chirantan@chromium.org>
Turns out my cargo-fmt binary was being sourced from ~/.cargo/bin, which
was very out of date. Hopefully less formatting issues come out of my
chroot now.
TEST=cargo fmt --all -- --check
BUG=None
Change-Id: I50592e2781835840dc5d589c681b3438d6de3370
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1324669
Commit-Ready: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <dverkamp@chromium.org>
The types from msg_socket were assumed to be in scope for the custom
derive implementation, which would cause mysterious compiler errors if
the custom derive was invoked in a module without msg_socket types in
scope.
This CL uses fully qualified types in the generated output to avoid
these errors.
This change also uses `extern crate msg_socket` in case the call site
doesn't have it in scope.
BUG=None
TEST=cargo test -p msg_on_socket_derive
Change-Id: Ie6443cd4ffc070d27e71de123090a58f19846472
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1314208
Commit-Ready: ChromeOS CL Exonerator Bot <chromiumos-cl-exonerator@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Tested-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jingkui Wang <jkwang@google.com>
MsgSock wraps UnixDatagram and provides simple macro to define Messages
that could be send through sock easily.
TEST=cargo test
BUG=None
Change-Id: I296fabc41893ad6a3ec42ef82dd29c3b752be8b8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1255548
Commit-Ready: ChromeOS CL Exonerator Bot <chromiumos-cl-exonerator@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Tested-by: Jingkui Wang <jkwang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
