Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
paulhsia
d1eceeca7b crosvm: Split sub-crates into independent workspace
Split sub-crates under crosvm root directory into several independent
workspaces for adding ebuild files for those crates.

data_model and sys_util could only be built by emerge after creating
their ebuilds.

BUG=chromium:916921
TEST='emerge-eve crosvm'
TEST=Run 'cargo build' under crosvm directory

Change-Id: I2dddbbb7c7344e643183a5885e867f134b299591
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1385972
Commit-Ready: Chih-Yang Hsia <paulhsia@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Chih-Yang Hsia <paulhsia@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Chirantan Ekbote <chirantan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
2019-01-03 15:04:23 -08:00
David Tolnay
1d4d44a8e2 sync: Mutex type with methods that panic instead of return error
This CL adds a crate `sync` containing a type sync::Mutex which wraps
the standard library Mutex and mirrors the same methods, except that
they panic where the standard library would return a PoisonError. This
API codifies our error handling strategy around poisoned mutexes in
crosvm.

- Crosvm releases are built with panic=abort so poisoning never occurs.
  A panic while a mutex is held (or ever) takes down the entire process.
  Thus we would like for code not to have to consider the possibility of
  poison.

- We could ask developers to always write `.lock().unwrap()` on a
  standard library mutex. However, we would like to stigmatize the use
  of unwrap. It is confusing to permit unwrap but only on mutex lock
  results. During code review it may not always be obvious whether a
  particular unwrap is unwrapping a mutex lock result or a different
  error that should be handled in a more principled way.

Developers should feel free to use sync::Mutex anywhere in crosvm that
they would otherwise be using std::sync::Mutex.

TEST=boot linux

Change-Id: I9727b6f8fee439edb4a8d52cf19d59acf04d990f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1359923
Commit-Ready: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
2018-12-05 01:13:41 -08:00