crosvm/seccomp/x86_64
Zach Reizner 4725a399f7 seccomp: tpm: remove fseek syscall from policy
There is no such syscall as fseek as far as I can tell. There is lseek,
which would be how fseek is implemented in libc, and it is already
included in the policy.

BUG=chromium:936633
TEST=parse_seccomp_policy seccomp/x86_64/tpm_device.policy

Change-Id: Ifb891395d7447d8b81cb1b17af18c49e5d5fc96f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1518490
Commit-Ready: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
Tested-by: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com>
Tested-by: Zach Reizner <zachr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dylan Reid <dgreid@chromium.org>
2019-03-14 20:53:40 -07:00
..
9p_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
balloon_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
block_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
common_device.policy crosvm: use seqpacket rather than datagram sockets 2019-02-28 03:24:24 -08:00
cras_audio_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
gpu_device.policy seccomp: unrefactor gpu_device.policy 2019-03-02 17:41:27 -08:00
input_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
net_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
null_audio_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
rng_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
tpm_device.policy seccomp: tpm: remove fseek syscall from policy 2019-03-14 20:53:40 -07:00
vhost_net_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
vhost_vsock_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00
wl_device.policy seccomp: refactor policy into common_device.policy 2019-02-07 03:02:12 -08:00