mirror of
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj.git
synced 2025-01-26 22:10:52 +00:00
refs: rename RefTarget::is_conflict() to has_conflict()
Copied from MergedTree::has_conflict(). I feel it's slightly better since RefTarget "is" always a Conflict-based type. It could be inverted to RefTarget::is_resolved(), but refs are usually resolved, and all callers have special case for !is_resolved() state.
This commit is contained in:
parent
961bb49ff0
commit
2bbaa4352a
7 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions
|
@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ pub fn export_some_refs(
|
|||
}
|
||||
let old_oid = if let Some(id) = old_branch.as_normal() {
|
||||
Some(Oid::from_bytes(id.as_bytes()).unwrap())
|
||||
} else if old_branch.is_conflict() {
|
||||
} else if old_branch.has_conflict() {
|
||||
// The old git ref should only be a conflict if there were concurrent import
|
||||
// operations while the value changed. Don't overwrite these values.
|
||||
failed_branches.push(jj_known_ref);
|
||||
|
@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ pub fn export_some_refs(
|
|||
if let Some(id) = new_branch.as_normal() {
|
||||
let new_oid = Oid::from_bytes(id.as_bytes());
|
||||
branches_to_update.insert(jj_known_ref, (old_oid, new_oid.unwrap()));
|
||||
} else if new_branch.is_conflict() {
|
||||
} else if new_branch.has_conflict() {
|
||||
// Skip conflicts and leave the old value in git_refs
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -198,8 +198,8 @@ impl RefTarget {
|
|||
!self.is_absent()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: overloaded naming: is_conflict() vs as_conflict()
|
||||
pub fn is_conflict(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
/// Whether this target has conflicts.
|
||||
pub fn has_conflict(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
!self.conflict.is_resolved()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ pub fn classify_branch_push_action(
|
|||
let remote_target = branch_target.remote_targets.get(remote_name).flatten();
|
||||
if local_target == remote_target {
|
||||
BranchPushAction::AlreadyMatches
|
||||
} else if local_target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
} else if local_target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
BranchPushAction::LocalConflicted
|
||||
} else if remote_target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
} else if remote_target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
BranchPushAction::RemoteConflicted
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
BranchPushAction::Update(BranchPushUpdate {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ fn ref_target_to_proto(value: &RefTarget) -> Option<crate::protos::op_store::Ref
|
|||
)),
|
||||
};
|
||||
Some(proto)
|
||||
} else if value.is_conflict() {
|
||||
} else if value.has_conflict() {
|
||||
// TODO: Preserve "absent" targets, and remove op_store::RefTargetMap hack.
|
||||
let ref_conflict_proto = crate::protos::op_store::RefConflict {
|
||||
removes: value.removed_ids().map(|id| id.to_bytes()).collect(),
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ fn test_rebase_descendants_update_branches_after_divergent_rewrite() {
|
|||
tx.mut_repo().rebase_descendants(&settings).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let target = tx.mut_repo().get_local_branch("main");
|
||||
assert!(target.is_conflict());
|
||||
assert!(target.has_conflict());
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
target.removed_ids().counts(),
|
||||
hashmap! { commit_b.id() => 2 },
|
||||
|
@ -1217,7 +1217,7 @@ fn test_rebase_descendants_rewrite_updates_branch_conflict() {
|
|||
tx.mut_repo().rebase_descendants(&settings).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let target = tx.mut_repo().get_local_branch("main");
|
||||
assert!(target.is_conflict());
|
||||
assert!(target.has_conflict());
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
target.removed_ids().counts(),
|
||||
hashmap! { commit_a.id() => 1, commit_b.id() => 1 },
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1469,11 +1469,11 @@ fn cmd_status(
|
|||
let mut conflicted_local_branches = vec![];
|
||||
let mut conflicted_remote_branches = vec![];
|
||||
for (branch_name, branch_target) in repo.view().branches() {
|
||||
if branch_target.local_target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
if branch_target.local_target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
conflicted_local_branches.push(branch_name.clone());
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (remote_name, remote_target) in &branch_target.remote_targets {
|
||||
if remote_target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
if remote_target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
conflicted_remote_branches.push((branch_name.clone(), remote_name.clone()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ fn build_branches_index(repo: &dyn Repo) -> RefNamesIndex {
|
|||
.filter(|&(_, target)| target != local_target)
|
||||
.peekable();
|
||||
if local_target.is_present() {
|
||||
let decorated_name = if local_target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
let decorated_name = if local_target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
format!("{branch_name}??")
|
||||
} else if unsynced_remote_targets.peek().is_some() {
|
||||
format!("{branch_name}*")
|
||||
|
@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ fn build_branches_index(repo: &dyn Repo) -> RefNamesIndex {
|
|||
index.insert(local_target.added_ids(), decorated_name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (remote_name, target) in unsynced_remote_targets {
|
||||
let decorated_name = if target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
let decorated_name = if target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
format!("{branch_name}@{remote_name}?")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
format!("{branch_name}@{remote_name}")
|
||||
|
@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ fn build_ref_names_index<'a>(
|
|||
) -> RefNamesIndex {
|
||||
let mut index = RefNamesIndex::default();
|
||||
for (name, target) in ref_pairs {
|
||||
let decorated_name = if target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
let decorated_name = if target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
format!("{name}?")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
name.clone()
|
||||
|
@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ fn build_ref_names_index<'a>(
|
|||
fn extract_git_head(repo: &dyn Repo, commit: &Commit) -> String {
|
||||
let target = repo.view().git_head();
|
||||
if target.added_ids().contains(commit.id()) {
|
||||
if target.is_conflict() {
|
||||
if target.has_conflict() {
|
||||
"HEAD@git?".to_string()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
"HEAD@git".to_string()
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue