Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yuya Nishihara
cff73841ed repo: remove &UserSettings argument from new/rewrite_commit(), use self.settings
Some checks are pending
binaries / Build binary artifacts (push) Waiting to run
nix / flake check (push) Waiting to run
build / build (, macos-13) (push) Waiting to run
build / build (, macos-14) (push) Waiting to run
build / build (, ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
build / build (, windows-latest) (push) Waiting to run
build / build (--all-features, ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
build / Build jj-lib without Git support (push) Waiting to run
build / Check protos (push) Waiting to run
build / Check formatting (push) Waiting to run
build / Check that MkDocs can build the docs (push) Waiting to run
build / Check that MkDocs can build the docs with latest Python and uv (push) Waiting to run
build / cargo-deny (advisories) (push) Waiting to run
build / cargo-deny (bans licenses sources) (push) Waiting to run
build / Clippy check (push) Waiting to run
Codespell / Codespell (push) Waiting to run
website / prerelease-docs-build-deploy (ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Scorecards supply-chain security / Scorecards analysis (push) Waiting to run
2024-12-31 10:51:57 +09:00
Yuya Nishihara
14b52205fb repo: remove &UserSettings argument from start_transaction(), use self.settings 2024-12-31 10:51:57 +09:00
Martin von Zweigbergk
8d090628c3 transaction: rename mut_repo() to idiomatic repo_mut()
We had both `repo()` and `mut_repo()` on `Transaction` and I think it
was easy to get confused and think that the former returned a
`&ReadonlyRepo` but both of them actually return a reference to
`MutableRepo` (the latter obviously returns a mutable reference). I
hope that renaming to the more idiomatic `repo_mut()` will help
clarify.

We could instead have renamed them to `mut_repo()` and
`mut_repo_mut()` but that seemed unnecessarily long. It would better
match the `mut_repo` variables we typically use, though.
2024-09-07 10:51:43 -07:00
Matt Kulukundis
8ead72e99f formatting only: switch to Item level import ganularity 2024-08-22 14:52:54 -04:00
Martin von Zweigbergk
dbf2a98903 rewrite: add CommitRewriter::record_abandoned_commit()
We already have two uses for this function and I think we're soon
going to have more.

The function record the old commit as abandoned with the new parents,
which is typically what you want. We could record it as abandoned with
the old parents instead but then we'd have to do an extra iteration to
find the parents when rebasing any children. It would also be
confusing if
`rewriter.set_parents(new_parents).record_abandoned_commit()` didn't
respect the new parents.
2024-04-30 20:03:57 -07:00
Evan Mesterhazy
f9a3021a7a Simplify calls to CommitRewriter::replace_parents()
Now that it takes `IntoIterator` the caller doesn't need to clone
the input `CommitIds`.
2024-04-21 23:31:17 -04:00
Martin von Zweigbergk
87c65ee0f9 rewrite: make CommitRewriter::replace_parents() remove repeats 2024-04-18 21:06:52 -07:00
Martin von Zweigbergk
96f5ca47d4 repo: add method for tranforming descendants, use in rebase_descendants()
There are several existing commands that would benefit from an API
that makes it easier to rewrite a whole graph of commits while
transforming them in some way.

`jj squash` is one example. When squashing into an ancestor, that
command currently rewrites the ancestor, then rebases descendants, and
then rewrites the rewritten source commit. It would be better to
rewrite the source commit (and any descendants) only once.

Another example is the future `jj fix`. That command will want to
rewrite a graph while updating the trees. There's currently no good
API for that; you have to manually iterate over descendants and
rewrite them.

This patch adds a new `MutableRepo::transform_descendants()` method
that takes a callback which gets a `CommitRewriter` passed to it. The
callback can then decide to change the parents, the tree, etc. The
callback is also free to leave the commit in place or to abandon it.

I updated the regular `rebase_descendants()` to use the new function
in order to exercise it. I hope we can replace all of the
`rebase_descendant_*()` flavors later.

I added a `replace_parent()` method that was a bit useful for the test
case. It could easily be hard-coded in the test case instead, but I
think the method will be useful for `jj git sync` and similar in the
future.
2024-04-18 21:06:52 -07:00