previously, aliases to built-in commands were silently ignored. this matches git's behavior, but seems unhelpful, especially if the user doesn't know that a command with that name already exists.
give a warning rather than silently ignoring it.
When using `ui.color = "debug"`, changes in the output style
additionally include delimiters << and >>, as well as all active labels
at this point separated by ::. The output is otherwise unformatted and
the delimiters and labels inherit the style of the content they apply
to.
Not all "branch list --all-remotes" callers are replaced because I'm going to
make get_branch_output() suppress hints by default, and there should be tests
for the hints.
This also means "all:" is allowed in default revsets (such as "revsets.log"),
but that seems okay. In revset aliases, "all:" isn't allowed because aliases
may be expanded to sub-expression position.
Closes#3654
Perhaps, this can be used to generate parsable branches list.
The hint for deleted branches isn't migrated to the template. I'm thinking of
moving it out of the loop and printed once at the end. If we want to generate
a hint in template, we'll probably need local_ref.tracking_remote_refs(), etc.
that return a list of RefNames.
More tests will be added later as "branch list" templates.
In "log" template, we might want to see the number of "local" commits ahead
of any tracked remotes. It can be implemented later in a similar way (or as a
nested remote_refs list.)
For example,
```
<<<<<<< Conflict 1 of 3
+++++++ Contents of side #1
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
%%%%%%% Changes from base to side #2
-line 3
+right 3.1
>>>>>>>
```
or
```
<<<<<<< Conflict 1 of 1
%%%%%%% Changes from base to side #1
-line 3
+right 3.1
+++++++ Contents of side #2
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
>>>>>>>
```
Currently, there is no way to disable these, this is TODO for a future
PR. Other TODOs for future PRs: make these labels configurable. After
that, we could support a `diff3/git`-like conflict format as well, in
principle.
Counting conflicts helps with knowing whether you fixed all the
conflicts while you are in the editor.
While labeling "side #1", etc, does not tell you the commit id or
description as requested in #1176, I still think it's an improvement.
Most importantly, I hope this will make `jj`'s conflict format less
scary-looking for new users.
I've used this for a bit, and I like it. Without the labels, I would see
that the two conflicts have a different order of conflict markers, but I
wouldn't be able to remember what that means. For longer diffs, it can
be tricky for me to quickly tell that it's a diff as opposed to one of
the sides. This also creates some hope of being able to navigate a
conflict with more than 2 sides.
Another not-so-secret goal for this is explained in
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/3109#issuecomment-2014140627. The
idea is a little weird, but I *think* it could be helpful, and I'd like
to experiment with it.
I considered adding RefTarget template type, but some of the methods naturally
fit to RefName. For example, a conflicted branch name is decorated as "??", so
it makes sense to add branch.conflict() instead of branch.target().conflict().
I'm not pretty sure how many RefName methods we'll need to add to port the
current branch listing, but there will be .tracked(), .tracking_local_present(),
.ahead_by(), and .behind_by().
I'm going to add more detailed output there. This is a step towards "branch
list" template. "tag list -T" wouldn't be that useful, but it shares primitives
with "branch list -T".
The `move_commits` function accepts a set of target commits to shift to
a new location given by `new_parents` and `new_children`. The roots of
the target set will be reparented onto `new_parents`. `new_children`
will then be reparented onto the heads of the target set.
The commits will be rebased in reverse topological order based on the
new set of parents of each commit, which avoids the need for multiple
sets of rebase operations.
When you use e.g. `git switch` to check out a conflicted commit,
you're going to end up with the `.jjconflicts-*` directories in your
working copy. It's probably not obvious what those mean. This patch
adds a README file to the root tree to try to explain to users what's
going on and how to recover.
The authoritative information about conflicts is stored in the
`jj:trees` commit header. The contents of conflicted commits is only
used for preventing GC. We can therefore add contents to the tree
without much consequence.
I will be updating `rebase -r` to avoid simplifying ancestor merges in a
subsequent commit, which will cause existing tests to fail for the Git
backend due to ancestor merges with the root commit.
I'm not sure if this was an intentional omission, but I think it would be
useful to have `-e` as a short flag for `--edit`. I don't usually edit commits,
but I do use `prev` and `next` with edit to navigate to a commit that I want to
squash. Often this is easier than typing `--from` and `--into` plus the change
IDs.
If people want to edit commits we shouldn't stand in their way.
This is following on the rewrite for `parallelize`.
- https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/3521
Since rebase_descendants from rebase.rs is no longer used outside of that file,
it can be made private again.
