This is another big subcommand module. Let's split it up.
I'm not a big fan of r#move syntax, but we already have one in src/commands,
so there's no point to avoid it.
The error message that says something like 'Workspace "default"
doesn't have a working copy' confused me when I saw it. The problem
it's describing is that the repo view doesn't have a working-copy
commit for the given workspace id. Saying "working-copy commit"
instead of "working copy" hopefully clarifies it a bit.
This basically supersedes the current "branch set" command. The plan is to turn
"branch set" into an "upsert" command, and deprecate "branch create". (#3584)
Maybe we can also add "branch set --new" flag to only allow creation of new
branches. One reason behind this proposed change is that "set" usually allows
both "creation" and "update". However, we also need a typo-safe version of
"set" to not create new branches by accident.
"jj branch move" is useful when advancing ancestor branches. Let's say you've
added a couple of commits on top of an existing PR branch, you can advance the
branch by "jj branch move --from 'heads(::@- & branches())' --to @-". If this
pattern is super common, maybe we can add --advance flag for short.
One drawback of this change is that "git branch --move" is equivalent to
"jj branch rename". I personally don't find this is confusing, but it's true
that "move" sometimes means "rename".
This basically backs out 8706fadca1 "cli: inline check for
non-fast-forwardable branch move." I'm going to add another subcommand that
moves existing branches.
By running CI on push to any branch, collaborators can check that CI
passes before sending for review, reducing mail spam and wasted
reviewer time before the code is ready.
Otherwise they wouldn't be sorted in help. I also reordered the match statement.
Since subcommands are split to per-file modules, there's no point to keep some
logical ordering.
The function has no callers outside the module anymore (probably since
`MaterializeTreeValue` but I haven't checked). Inlining it will help
keep error handling simple in the next commit. Otherwise we'd need to
have it return an error type wrapping both `BackendError` and
`io::Error`.
I don't think the message adds anything over what the `BackendError`
itself provides, so let's use `transparent` instead.
I also dropped the `Internal` prefix from the variant because that
also didn't seem to add anything.
- make an internal set of watchman extensions until the client api gets
updates with triggers
- add a config option to enable using triggers in watchman
Co-authored-by: Waleed Khan <me@waleedkhan.name>
There's been a lot of questions about the subtle differences between
`..` and `::`. I hope these examples will help with that.
We should also add examples to the revset functions (e.g. `heads()` is
not obvious how it works), but that can come later.
`..` is shorthand for `root()..visible_head()`, for example. We don't
seem to explain that anywhere. I hope mentioning that will help
readers understand the relationship between the shorthands and the
full `x..y`, and also to see the correspondence between `..` and `::`
(in how their default left and right operands are the same).
If I can't tell what this comment means, probably nobody else can
either.
I think it might be a copy-paste error from whatever docs I copied the
initial version of the config from.
I am currently not aware of any severe differences between the generated
markdown and `jj help`, though this could change if we look over the
text carefully or if we start using `clap` features we weren't using
before.
