Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Metzger
09a99e36dc docs/design: Clarify run.md a bit.
This is essentially a new version, which clarifies multiple statements about
`jj run`. Notably, it cleans up some mistakes which were overlooked or deemed
good enough in the Google Docs version.
2023-09-14 16:39:40 +02:00
Philip Metzger
5b729a90a9 docs/design: Move the run doc to github.
This ticks another box in #1869.

Co-Authored-By: arxanas <me@waleedkhan.name>
Co-Authored-By: hooper <hooper@google.com>
Co-Authored-By: martinvonz <martinvonz@google.com>
2023-09-14 16:39:40 +02:00
Yuya Nishihara
aae9aa4a7a doc: add plan for non-tracking branches support
#1136, #1666, #1734
2023-08-23 09:58:01 +09:00
Glen Choo
d165e931eb docs/design: propose submodule storage approach
This doc discusses the requirements of a submodule storage solution and
proposes a solution: storing submodules as full jj repos.
2023-04-24 14:29:47 -07:00
Glen Choo
562eebe213 WIP docs/design: describe submodule storage ideas and how to judge them
This doc describes what we need to consider in a submodule storage
solution, some possible solutions and what criteria we should use to
decide on a future direction.

This is still a WIP:

- The solutions are still underdescribed
- The actual evaluation of solutions is missing

Suggestions for the above are welcome :)
2023-04-24 14:29:47 -07:00
Glen Choo
707d82245f docs/technical: add aspirational Git submodules doc
This document is meant to be a record of how we think about Git
submodules (and not a _current_ implementation of submodules). We will
fill it out incrementally as we get a clearer idea of what we want
submodules to look like.

As an initial version, I started with (IMO) the least controversial
points:

- We want to support most workflows Git submodules users are accustomed
  to.

- A roadmap that allows us to incrementally roll out Git submodule
  functionality (instead of having to boil the ocean).
2023-04-03 12:58:17 -07:00