Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
This enables workflows like "insert a commit that reformats the code in one of
my project directories".
`jj fix --include-unchanged-files` is an easy way to fix everything in the repo.
`jj fix --include-unchanged-files <file...>` fixes all of the `<files>` even if they are
unchanged.
This is mostly orthogonal to other features, so not many tests are added.
This is a significant and simple enough improvement that I think it's
appropriate to make it here instead of waiting for a `jj run`-based solution.
The high level changes include:
- Reworking `fix_file_ids()` to loop over multiple candidate tools per file,
piping file content between them. Only the final file content is written to
the store, and content is no longer read for changed files that don't match
any of the configured patterns.
- New struct `ToolsConfig` to represent the parsed/validated configuration.
- New function `get_tools_config()` to create a `ToolsConfig` from a `Config`.
- New tests; the only old behavior that has changed is that we don't require
`fix.tool-command` if `fix.tools` defines one or more tools. The general
approach to validating the config is to fail early if anything is weird.
Co-Authored-By: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
It's common to create empty working-copy commits while using jj, and
currently the author timestamp for a commit is only set when it is first
created. If you create an empty commit, then don't work on a repo for a
few days, and then start working on a new feature without abandoning the
working-copy commit, the author timestamp will remain as the time the
commit was created rather than being updated to the time that work began
or finished.
This commit changes the behavior so that discardable commits (empty
commits with no description) by the current user have their author
timestamps reset when they are rewritten, meaning that the author
timestamp will become finalized whenever a commit is given a description
or becomes non-empty.
We now have two `cmd_show` in the repo. I think this one should become
`cmd_file_show`, but this should be done uniformly over all the commands
for consistency.
I did *not* keep `print` as an alias (I couldn't find a compelling
reason to do it), but let me know if anyone feels like keeping it.
Most of the value of `jj fix` over a shell script is in formatting commits
other than `@`. `@::` often doesn't contain those other commits, so `-s @` is a
bad default.
We could get the same effect from `-s 'mutable() & ::@'`, but `reachable()` is
a bit more explicit and simple to read.
We could also base this on excluding `trunk()`, but that just seems like an
indirection for `mutable()` that might ignore the user's intent if they have
configured part of trunk to be mutable.
As we discovered in the `jj fix` tests,
`MergedTreeBuilder::write_tree()` doesn't try to resolve conflicts,
not even trivial ones. This patch fixes that.
