@joyously found `o` confusing because it's a valid change id prefix. I
don't have much preference, but `●` seems fine. The "ascii",
"ascii-large", and "legacy" graph styles still use "o".
I didn't change `@` since it seems useful to have that match the
symbol used on the CLI. I don't think we want to have users do
something like `jj co ◎-`.
This eliminates ambiguous parsing between "func()" and "expr ()".
I chose "++" as template concatenation operator in case we want to add
bit-wise negate operator. It's also easier to find/replace than "~".
This allows us to use "if(description,)" to test empty description. And
I think this change is unavoidable if we want to add support for commit
template.
I think this is the same bug as reported in #922, just simplified a
bit further. The branches in the repo actually look good after the
`undo` operation, but the reverted `master` branch doesn't get
exported to the git repo even though our recorded `refs/heads/master`
in the repo was moved back. Then the next automatic import on `log`
notices that the `master` branch in the git repo still points to the
new commit, and that commit becomes visible again.
Otherwise the description set by -m would differ from the one set by editor.
This fixes test_describe() which says "make no changes", but previously "\n"
would be added by the second "jj describe".
As you can see, almost all hashes change in CLI tests. This means in-flight
PRs will need to be rebased to update insta snapshots.
Description text could be normalized by CommitBuilder, but the caller would
have to normalize it beforehand to compare with the current description, so
we would need an explicit function anyway. Another idea is to add a newtype
that represents a normalized description, and make CommitBuilder require it.
Commit::description() will return &Description in place of &str to ensure
that commit.description() == raw_str wouldn't compile.
Git CLI provides --cleanup=<mode> option to switch normalization rules, but
I don't think we'll need such feature.
This fixes the bug described in the previous commit.
Because we now print the message about failed exports also while
snapshotting, we may end up reporting it twice on one command. I'm not
sure it's worth worrying about that. We can deal with that later if it
turns out to be a common complaint.
If a branch points to the working-copy commit, it will automatically
get updated when the working copy is snapshotted. However, it turns
out that we don't automatically export the change to Git when running
in a colocated working copy (nor in a non-colocated working copy, but
that shouldn't be surprising). The change will not get exported until
a non-snapshot operation runs. We noticed this bug in @hooper's repo
today.
If the user creates a branch with an empty name, it seems very likely
to be an accident. Let's help them realize that by erroring out.
I didn't add the same checks to `jj branch delete`, since that would
make it hard to delete a branch with an empty name from existing
repos.
Let's acknowledge everyone's contributions by replacing "Google LLC"
in the copyright header by "The Jujutsu Authors". If I understand
correctly, it won't have any legal effect, but maybe it still helps
reduce concerns from contributors (though I haven't heard any
concerns).
Google employees can read about Google's policy at
go/releasing/contributions#copyright.
This adds a warning whenever export to the backing Git repo fails,
whether it's by an explicit `jj git export` or an automatic export. It
might be too spammy to print the message after every failed command in
the colocated case, but let's try it and see.
When we export branches to Git, we didn't update our own record of
Git's refs. This frequently led to spurious conflicts in these refs
(e.g. #463). This is typically what happened:
1. Import a branch pointing to commit A from Git
2. Modify the branch in jj to point to commit B
3. Export the branch to Git
4. Update the branch in Git to point to commit C
5. Import refs from Git
In step 3, we forgot to update our record of the branch in the repo
view's `git_refs` field. That led to the import in step 5 to think
that the branch moved from A to C in Git, which conflicts with the
internal branch target of B.
This commit fixes the bug by updating the refs in the `MutableRepo`.
Closes#463.
We had very little testing of the colocated case, so let's add a bit
more before I start working on this code in coming patches. This
includes a test for #463.
The whole file is about the colocated case, where we automatically
import and export on every command, so there should be no reason to
call `git import` here.
I was trying to create a reproduction script for #412, but the script
ran into another bug first. The script removed all the local and
remote branches from the backing Git repo. I noticed that we would
then try to abandon all commits. We should still count Git HEAD's
target as visible and not try to abandon it. This patch fixes that.
It can be confusing that some commits (typically the working copy)
don't have a description. Let's show a placeholder text in such cases.
I chose the format to match the "(no email configured)" message we
already have.
Since 57ba9a9409, if the automatic import from git results in some
abandoned commit, that information gets recorded in the `MutableRepo`,
but I forgot to add a call to rebase the descendants. That causes a
failed assertion at
81a8cfefcb/lib/src/transaction.rs (L86). This
patch add a test showing that failure.
When initializing a workspace that shares its working copy with a Git
repo (i.e. `jj init --git-repo=.`), we import refs and HEAD when
creating the `WorkspaceCommandHelper` (as we do for all commands when
the working copy is shared). That makes the explicit import we do in
`cmd_init()` unnecessary. It also makes the checkout of HEAD I added
for the fix of #102 unnecessary. More importantly, as @yuja reported
in #177, it makes the command crash (at least if the repo is small
enough that the two checkouts happen within a second). I think the
problem is that the second checkout tries to create the same commit
except that the Change ID is different (the problem is not the
predecessors as I speculated in the issue tracker). The fix is to
simply avoid doing the redundant work. We still need a proper fix for
#27 eventually.
Closes#177.
This patch adds a very simple e2e test of having a working copy shared
with Git. The test initially failed on Windows. The symptom was that
the "master" branch did not get updated when we create a commit using
`jj`. That suggested that we didn't correctly detect that the working
copy was shared. After a lot of troubleshooting, I think I mostly
understand what we going on here (thanks to @arxanas for suggesting
https://github.com/mxschmitt/action-tmate). The path we get from
`git2::Repository::workdir()` seems to not be canonicalized in the
same way as `std::fs::canonicalize()` canonicalizes. Specifically, it
does not have the "\\?\" prefix we get from that function. I suppose
that's because libgit2 is a C library and canonicalizes the path using
some other system call.
