I was trying to create a reproduction script for #412, but the script
ran into another bug first. The script removed all the local and
remote branches from the backing Git repo. I noticed that we would
then try to abandon all commits. We should still count Git HEAD's
target as visible and not try to abandon it. This patch fixes that.
It seems simpler to do the snapshotting after merging any concurrent
operations instead of snapshotting on top of one of the operations,
especially since the attempt to snapshot may end up noticing that the
working copy is stale.
More importantly, snapshotting before resolving operations resulted in
a crash if the working copy was modified. That happened because we
held a lock on the operation heads (`locked_op_heads`) while we tried
to record the operation committing the working copy. I noticed this
only after adding the test.
This commit adds a reminder in `finish_transaction()` if the user
hasn't configured their name and email. That means they'll get a
reminder after most mutating commits, except for commands that only
snapshot the working copy, and a few more cases.
Closes#530.
The native backend is just a proof of concept and there's no real
reason to use it other than for testing, so let's reduce the risk of
accidentally creating repos using it.
I changed the "GLOGAL OPTIONS" help heading to use title case, to
match clap's new help style.
I also removed our override of the help text for `-h, --help` because
the default text now includes "(use `-h` for a summary)" (and it's
harder override now).
Perhaps the most obvious difference to users will be the changed help
output
(https://epage.github.io/blog/2022/09/clap4/#polishing-help-output). It
no longer has color, and long lines are not wrapped. I suppose we
should wrap the text ourselves instead..
I feel the original -------/+++++++ pair is slightly confusing because
each half can be a separator by itself. I don't know what character other
than '-'/'+' is preferred, but let's pick '%' (for "mod") per @martinvonz
suggestion.
`wc_commit` seems clearer than `checkout` and not too much longer. I
considered `working_copy` but it was less clear (could be the path to
the working copy, or an instance of `WorkingCopy`). I also considered
`working_copy_commit`, but that seems a bit too long.
In the current implementation, tree is diffed twice if both PATH and -p
are specified. If this adds significant cost, we'll need to reimplement
it without using a revset abstraction (or maybe adjust revset/graph API.)
Previously, using `rebase -r` on the parent of a merge commit
turned it into a non-merge commit. In other words, starting
with
```
o d
|\
o | c
o | b
| o a
|/
o
```
and doing `rebase -r c -d a` resulted in
```
o d
o b
| o c
| o a
|/
o
```
where `d` is no longer a merge commit.
For reference, here's a complete test that passed before this commit (but should NOT pass; see the diff for a test that should pass):
```
#[test]
fn test_rebase_single_revision_merge_parent() {
let test_env = TestEnvironment::default();
test_env.jj_cmd_success(test_env.env_root(), &["init", "repo", "--git"]);
let repo_path = test_env.env_root().join("repo");
create_commit(&test_env, &repo_path, "a", &[]);
create_commit(&test_env, &repo_path, "b", &[]);
create_commit(&test_env, &repo_path, "c", &["b"]);
create_commit(&test_env, &repo_path, "d", &["a", "c"]);
// Test the setup
insta::assert_snapshot!(get_log_output(&test_env, &repo_path), @r###"
@
o d
|\
o | c
o | b
| o a
|/
o
"###);
let stdout = test_env.jj_cmd_success(&repo_path, &["rebase", "-r", "c", "-d", "a"]);
insta::assert_snapshot!(stdout, @r###"
Also rebased 2 descendant commits onto parent of rebased commit
Working copy now at: 3e176b54d680 (no description set)
Added 0 files, modified 0 files, removed 2 files
"###);
insta::assert_snapshot!(get_log_output(&test_env, &repo_path), @r###"
@
o d
| o c
o | b
| o a
|/
o
"###);
}
```
Add the `jj interdiff` command for comparing only the diffs of commits.
Its args are identical to that of `jj diff`, minus `--revision` (because
interdiff always requires two commits).
Like `jj obslog -p`, Changes introduced by intervening commits are
ignored by rebasing `--from` onto `--to` 's parents.
`jj merge` just creates an empty change, which is practically the same
as `jj new`. The main difference is that the former requires more than
one argument and the latter requires at most one argument. It seems
cleaner to generalize them and make them aliases. This patch starts
doing that by making `jj new` accept more than one argument.
Instead of having `jj merge` be exactly an alias for `jj new`, we may
want to make it a thin wrapper that just checks that more than one
argument was given. That would probably be less confusing to users who
run `jj merge` without arguments to see what it does.
We should probably make `jj checkout` also be an alias for `jj new`,
but that will have to wait until we have removed support for open
commits (since `jj checkout` still has logic for dealing with open
commits).
In 8ae9540f2c, I made `jj move/squash/unsquash` not abandon the
working copy if it became empty because that would lose any
description associated with it. It turned out that the new behavior
was also confusing because it made it unclear if the working-copy
commit was actually abandoned. Let's roll back that change and instead
ask the user for a combined description when both the source and
destination commits have non-empty descriptions. Not discarding a
non-empty description seems like a good improvement regardless of the
behavior related to working-copy commits. It's also how `hg fold`
behaves (though hg doesn't allow the description to be empty).
libgit2 by default will respect config files present on a user's
machine---in particular, when creating a new repo, it will read
`init.defaultBranch` to determine what the name of the default branch
should be. This makes the tests non-hermetic, so disable that feature.
On my machine, `init.defaultBranch` is set in system config. Without
this patch, `test_git_colocated` and
`test_git_colocated_rebase_on_import` fail, but with this patch, they
pass.
The two commands are very similar and we should probably make one an
alias of the other (or just delete one), but for now let's at least
make them more similar by supporting `-m` for both.
I currently think `jj new` is more natural when starting a new change
on top of the current one and `jj checkout` is more natural when
starting a new change on top of another one, as well as when you just
want to look around or run tests. `jj checkout` doesn't currently
default to the working copy like `jj new` does. Perhaps we should make
it do that. Will people eventually feel that it's natural to run `jj
checkout` to create a new change on top of the working copy, or will
they feel that it's natural to run `jj new` on an unrelated commit
even to just look around, or will we want them as synonyms forever?
I was initially worried about the cost of always snapshotting the
working copy, so that's why e.g. `jj diff -r <some hash>` doesn't do
it. However, there's been a few caused by missing snapshotting, and
there are still a few (I just noticed it in `jj undo` while writing
this patch). Let's always do the snapshotting and if the user really
doesn't want it, they can pass `--no-commit-working-copy` (which we
should probably rename to `--no-snapshot-working-copy` or maybe just
`--no-snapshot`). That should reduce bugs and make the CLI more
predictable.
Two test cases were affected becasue `jj merge` also didn't snapshot
the working copy.
Before this patch, e.g. `jj co --no-commit-working-copy` would error
out, but now it will succeed (without touching the working copy,
leaving the working copy stale). That may be confusing, but it should
be easy to recover from (e.g. by `jj undo`). We can consider adding a
check for it later if it seems too confusing (it's probably rarely
something the user wanted).
Since we now allow pushing open commits, we can implement support for
pushing the "current" branch by defining a "current" branch as any
branch pointing to `@`. That definition of a current/active seems to
have been the consensus in discussion #411.
Closes#246.
Since whitespace change is barely visible in color-words diff, I think it
would be too verbose to add "\ No newline at end of file" marker. Let's just
append missing newline to make the command output readable.
It's convenient to push all changed branches every time with `jj git
push`, but sometimes I want to know which branches were actually
pushed. This make the command print what it's going to do.
I'll add a `--dry-run` mode and tests next.
I think I had not added tests for successful push before because I
thought there was some issue with testing it with libgit2. There *is*
an issue, which is that libgit2 requires the remote to be bare when
it's on local disk, but we can very easily make the git repo bare in
this test.
I also updated the error handling in the `git` module to not let
follow-on errors hide the real error and to not fail if two branches
moved to the same commit.
We used to check only if the destination already had a `.jj/`
directory. This patch changes that to check that the destination is an
empty directory.
Closes#399.
We didn't seem to have any. I included a test for #399.
The tests also showed how the debug formatting (`{:?}`) results in
escaped (e.g.) backslashes on Windows, which is not what we want, so I
also fixed that.
By adding `ui.open-commits=false` in your config, you can now make `jj
checkout` always create a new working-copy commit on top of the
specified commit. If the config is set, open commits will also appear
in the same color as closed commits in `jj log` etc. This will let
some of us experiment with the new UX before we decide if it's a good
idea or not. I left `jj close` in place because it's useful for
setting a description and creating a new commit in one step.
I didn't mention the new config in the release notes because I hope we
can reach a decision and remove the config before the next release.
I'm about to change how `jj checkout` works w.r.t. open/closed commits
(and in particular by moving some logic from the library crate to the
CLI), so let's make sure we have some test coverage.
