I have used the tree-level conflict format for several weeks without
problem (after the fix in 51b5d168ae). Now - right after the 0.10.0
release - seems like a good time to enable the config by default.
I enabled the config in our default configs in the CLI crate to reduce
impact on tests (compared to changing the default in `settings.rs`).
When we start writing tree-level conflicts in an existing repo, we
don't want commits that change the format to be non-empty if they
don't change any content. This patch updates `MergeTreeId::eq()` to
consider two resolved trees equal even if only their `MergedTreeId`
variant is different (one is path-level and one is tree-level).
I think I've gone through all places we compare tree ids and checked
that it's safe to compare them this way. One consequence is that
rebasing a commit without changing the parents (typically
auto-rebasing after `jj describe`) will not lead to the tree id
getting upgraded, due to an optimization we have for that case. I
don't think that's serious enough to handle specially; we'll have to
support the old format for existing repos for a while regardless of a
few commits not getting upgraded right away.
The number of failing tests with the config option enabled drop from
108 to 11 with this patch.
We're finally ready to start writing trees using the new format where
we represent conflicts by having multiple trees in the commit instead
of having a single tree with multiple entries at a path. This patch
adds a config option for that. It's not ready to be used yet, so I
haven't updated the release notes or other documentation.
I added only a simple CLI test for testing what happens when the
config is enabled in an existing repo. 108 tests currently fail if we
flip the default.
