See discussion thread in linked issue.
With this PR, all revset functions in [BUILTIN_FUNCTION_MAP](8d166c7642/lib/src/revset.rs (L570))
that return multiple values are either named in plural or the naming is hard to misunderstand (e.g. `reachable`)
Fixes: #4122
* See #4239 for details.
* For now, update working copy before reporting repo changes, so that
potential errors in reporting changes don't leave the repo in a stale
state.
Fixes: #4239
* First fetch from remote.
* Then check tx.{base_repo(),repo}.view().remote_bookmarks_matching(<branch>, <remote>).
This has to happen after the fetch has been done so the tx.repo() is updated.
* Warn if a branch is not found in any of the remotes used in the fetch. Note that the remotes
used in the fetch can be a subset of the remotes configured for the repo, so the language
of the warning tries to point that out.
Fixes: #4293
This will help simplify warning handling in future patches. I'm going to add
deprecation warnings to revset, so Ui will be required in order to parse a user
revset expression.
revset_util::parse_immutable_expression() is inlined as it's a thin wrapper
around parse_immutable_heads_expression().
`jj bookmark` is a frequently used command. Its subcommands already have
one letter aliases. Defining `jj b` as an alias for `jj bookmarks` make
bookmarks really easy to use.
"Bookmark changes" sounds like changes will be bookmarked, and "Bookmark" here
is redundant. If we add support for pushing tags, this message will have to be
generalized anyway.
This makes it easier to work with multiple remotes at once while
tracking the default branch of the remote used to create the local
repository:
```shell
$ jj git clone --remote upstream https://github.com/upstream-org/repo
$ cd repo
$ jj git remote add origin git@github.com:your-org/repo
$ jj config set --repo git.fetch upstream
```
In the example above, `upstream` is the repository containing the
reference source code that you might want to patch, while `origin` is
your fork where pull-request will be pushed. The branch `main@upstream`
will be tracked.
This is basically "log -p" for "op log". The flag name has "op" because --diff
and --patch mean a similar thing in this context. Since -p implies --op-diff,
user can just do "op log -p" if he's okay with verbose op + content diffs.
Note that --no-graph affects both "op log" and "op diff" parts.
We might want to do some style changes later, such as inserting/deleting blank
lines, highlighting headers, etc.
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
It's a pretty frequent request to have support for turning off
auto-tracking of new files and to have a command to manually track
them instead. This patch adds a `snapshot.auto-track` config to decide
which paths to auto-track (defaults to `all()`). It also adds a `jj
track` command to manually track the untracked paths.
This patch does not include displaying the untracked paths in `jj
status`, so for now this is probably only useful in colocated repos
where you can run `git status` to find the untracked files.
#323
I'm thinking of adding an option to embed operation diffs in "op log", and
"op log" shouldn't fail at the root operation. Let's make "op diff"/"show"
also work for consistency.
This flag implements three modes:
- `copy`: copy sparse patterns from parent
- `full`: do not copy sparse patterns from parent
- `empty`: clear all paths, equal to `set --clear`
This is useful for various tooling like tools that want to run a parallel
process that queries the build system (without running into locks/blocking.)
I think continuing to copy sparse patterns makes sense as the default behavior.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
This enables workflows like "insert a commit that reformats the code in one of
my project directories".
`jj fix --include-unchanged-files` is an easy way to fix everything in the repo.
`jj fix --include-unchanged-files <file...>` fixes all of the `<files>` even if they are
unchanged.
This is mostly orthogonal to other features, so not many tests are added.
This is a significant and simple enough improvement that I think it's
appropriate to make it here instead of waiting for a `jj run`-based solution.
It seems everyone agrees that `obslog` is not an intuitive name. There
was some discussion about alternatives in #3592 and on #4146. The
alternatives included `evolution`, `evolutionlog`, `evolog`,
`rewritelog`, `revlog`, and `changelog`. It seemed like
`evolution-log`/`evolog` was the most popular option. That also
matches the command's current help text ("Show how a change has
evolved over time").
As reported in #4394, at least `test_show_command::test_show_basic`
can fail when run with a narrow terminal. This patch sets
`COLUMNS=100` in the environment when running tests so the CLI uses
that value instead of using the width of the user's terminal.
Right now, renamed and copied files don't have any color in the output
of `jj status`, and it makes them stand out. I think it's reasonable to
color renamed files the same as modified files, since renaming is like
modifying the path, and to color copied files the same as added files,
since they're basically just added files that happen to have similar
contents to an existing file.
"Concurrent" operations are not necessarily actually concurrent, so
"divergent" seems like a better name. And "reconcile" seems like a
better term for merging them, though we also sometimes use "merge".
I played with max-inline-alternation = 3 for a couple of weeks, and it's pretty
good. I think somewhere between 2 and 4 is good default because one or two
remove + add sequences are easy to parse.
If movement commands don't find a target commit, they fail. However,
it's usually not intuitive why they fail because in non-edit mode the
start commit is the parent of the working commit.
Adding the start commit change hash to the error message makes it easier
for the user to figure out what is going on.
Also, specifying 'No **other** descendant...' helps make it clear what
`jj` is really looking for.
Part of #3947
