The function only needs the `TreeValue` so it makes more sense this
way, I think. That will also let the caller keep the rest of the
`Conflict` value owned (though there is nothing but the `value` field
in it right now).
It took a while before I realized that conflicts could be modeled as
simple algebraic expressions with positive and negative terms (they
were modeled as recursive 3-way conflicts initially). We've been
thinking of them that way for a while now, so let's make the
`ConflictPart` name match that model.
When we materialize modify/delete conflicts, we currently don't
include any context lines. That's because modify/delete conflicts have
only two sides, so there's no common base to compare to. Hunks that
are unchanged on the "modify" side are therefore not considered
conflicting, and since they they don't contribute new changes, they're
simply skipped (here:
3dfedf5814/lib/src/files.rs (L228-L230)).
It seems more useful to instead pretend that the missing side is an
empty file. That way we'll get a conflict in the entire file.
We can still decide later to make e.g. `jj resolve` prompt the user on
modify/delete conflicts just like `hg resolve` does (or maybe it
actually happens earlier there, I don't remember).
Closes#1244.
If I understand correctly, the 'revset lifetimes on `Box<dyn
Revset<'index> + 'revset>` are not constrained by the lifetime of a
revset; we don't have any revsets that borrow data from other
revsets. Instead, they're all about constraining a boxed revset to the
index's lifetime. Without the lifetime annotation, it would default to
'static, and the borrow-checker doesn't like `dyn Revset<'index> +
'static`, since the revset could then live longer than the index it
borrows.
This is just a little preparation for extracting a `Repo` trait that's
implemented by both `ReadonlyRepo` and `MutableRepo`. The `index()`
function in that trait will of course have to return the same type in
both implementations, and that type will be `&dyn Index`.
Even though we don't know the details yet, we know that we want to
make the index pluggable like the commit and opstore
backends. Defining a trait for it should be a good step. We can refine
the trait later.
By separating the value spaces change ids and commit ids, we can
simplify lookup of a prefix. For example, if we know that a prefix is
for a change id, we don't have to try to find matching commit ids. I
think it might also help new users more quickly understand that change
ids are not commit ids.
This commit is a step towards that separation. It allows resolving
change ids by using hex digits from the back of the alphabet instead
of 0-f, so 'z'='0', 'y'='1', etc, and 'k'='f'. Thanks to @ilyagr for
the idea. The regular hex digits are still allowed.
Supported values are,
- `none` for no author information,
- `full` for both the name and email,
- `name` for just the name,
- `username` for username part of the email,
- (default) `email` (or any other gibberish for that matter) for the full email.
There's a subtle difference between
- 'expression = { whitespace* ... whitespace* }', and
- '_{ whitespace* ~ expression ~ whitespace* }'.
The former includes surrounding whitespace in an "expression", the latter
doesn't. This affects the span of error indication.
The added expect_arguments() is basically a copy from the template_parser.
I'll reimplement it to support keyword arguments, so I don't care much about
the current implementation.
I leave expect_no/one_argument() as wrappers because parsing 0/1 arguments
is pretty common.
Error messages are slightly changed. I personally prefer not to add extra
code for singular/plural handling, but if we do, I'll add 'if N == 1' case.
Our internal backend at Google uses a 32-byte change id, so I'd like
to make the backend able to decide the length. To start with, let's
make the backend able to decide what the root change id should
be. That's consistent with how we already let the backend decide what
the root commit id should be.
The function is currently only about the length of commit IDs, so
let's clarify that. I'm going to add another function for the length
of change IDs next. I don't know if we're going to care about lengths
of other hashes in the future. We might even be able to remove the
current restriction that all commit IDs and all change IDs have the
same length.
I think the CLI currently checks that the backend is not told to write
a merge commit with the root as one parent, but we should not panic if
those checks fail.
Git's HEAD ref is similar to other refs and can logically have
conflicts just like the other refs in `git_refs`. As with the other
refs, it can happen if you run concurrent commands importing two
different updates from Git. So let's treat `git_head` the same as
`git_refs` by making it an `Option<RefTarget>`.
Add a new git.auto-local-branch config option. When set to false, a
remote-tracking branch imported from Git will not automatically create a
local branch target. This is implemented by a new GitSettings struct
that passes Git-related settings from UserSettings.
This behavior is particularly useful in a co-located jj and Git repo,
because a Git remote might have branches that are not of everyday
interest to the user, so it does not make sense to export them as local
branches in Git. E.g. https://github.com/gitster/git, the maintainer's
fork of Git, has 379 branches, most of which are topic branches kept
around for historical reasons, and Git developers wouldn't be expected
to have local branches for each remote-tracking branch.
I don't think there's a good reason not to write the
`.jj/working_copy/tree_state` file on init. Being able to assume that
the file exists means that we won't need the store object to to lazily
load the `TreeState` object. Well, except that `TreeState` keeps an
`Arc<Store>`, but I'm trying to change that.
When building an initial index from an existing Git repo, for example,
we walk parents and predecessors to find all commits to index. Part of
that code was looking up the whole parent and predecessor commits even
though it only needed the ids. I don't know if this has a measurable
impact on performance, but it's not really any more complex to just
get the ids anyway.
I would expect `Commit::is_empty()` to check if the commit is empty in
our usual sense, i.e. that there are no changes compared to the
auto-merged parents. However, it would return `false` for any merge
commit (and for the root commit). Since we only use it in one place,
let's inline it there. The use there does seem reasonable, because
it's about abandoning an "uninteresting" working-copy commit.
