Clear the rest of the cursor line (from the cursor to the end of the
row) after drawing the progress bar rather than clearing the entire line
before drawing. This reduces flickering on terminal emulators which are
able to redraw rapidly.
I recently needed to test something on top of a two branches at the
same time, so I created a new commit on top of both of them (i.e. a
merge commit). I then ran tests and made some adjustments to the
code. These adjustments belonged in one of the parent branches, so I
used `jj squash --into` to squash it in there. Unfortunately, that
meant that my working copy became a single-parent commit based on one
of the branches only. We already had #2859 for tracking this issue.
This patch changes the behavior so we create a new working-copy commit
with all of the previous parents.
As explained in the commit, our logic is a bit more complicated than
that of `git push --force-with-lease`. This is to match the behavior of
`jj git fetch` and branch conflict resolution rules.
I add them as aliases, since a user may instead choose to define `immutable_heads()`, for example, as `heads(immutable())`, and the define `immutable()` instead.
This revset correctly implements "reachability" from a set of source commits following both parent and child edges as far as they can go within a domain set. This type of 'bfs' query is currently impossible to express with existing revset functions.
previously, aliases to built-in commands were silently ignored. this matches git's behavior, but seems unhelpful, especially if the user doesn't know that a command with that name already exists.
give a warning rather than silently ignoring it.
When using `ui.color = "debug"`, changes in the output style
additionally include delimiters << and >>, as well as all active labels
at this point separated by ::. The output is otherwise unformatted and
the delimiters and labels inherit the style of the content they apply
to.
Perhaps, this can be used to generate parsable branches list.
The hint for deleted branches isn't migrated to the template. I'm thinking of
moving it out of the loop and printed once at the end. If we want to generate
a hint in template, we'll probably need local_ref.tracking_remote_refs(), etc.
that return a list of RefNames.
For example,
```
<<<<<<< Conflict 1 of 3
+++++++ Contents of side #1
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
%%%%%%% Changes from base to side #2
-line 3
+right 3.1
>>>>>>>
```
or
```
<<<<<<< Conflict 1 of 1
%%%%%%% Changes from base to side #1
-line 3
+right 3.1
+++++++ Contents of side #2
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
>>>>>>>
```
Currently, there is no way to disable these, this is TODO for a future
PR. Other TODOs for future PRs: make these labels configurable. After
that, we could support a `diff3/git`-like conflict format as well, in
principle.
Counting conflicts helps with knowing whether you fixed all the
conflicts while you are in the editor.
While labeling "side #1", etc, does not tell you the commit id or
description as requested in #1176, I still think it's an improvement.
Most importantly, I hope this will make `jj`'s conflict format less
scary-looking for new users.
I've used this for a bit, and I like it. Without the labels, I would see
that the two conflicts have a different order of conflict markers, but I
wouldn't be able to remember what that means. For longer diffs, it can
be tricky for me to quickly tell that it's a diff as opposed to one of
the sides. This also creates some hope of being able to navigate a
conflict with more than 2 sides.
Another not-so-secret goal for this is explained in
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/3109#issuecomment-2014140627. The
idea is a little weird, but I *think* it could be helpful, and I'd like
to experiment with it.
Thanks to everyone who's contributed!
Unlike previous releases, I went through the changelog entries and
reorganized them a bit.
We didn't have anything under "Deprecations" this time, but I moved
the heading after "Breaking changes" for next release. I think
breaking changes are more important because deprecations are just
about giving a heads up before it actually breaks.
Since fileset/revset/template expressions are specified as command-line
arguments, it's sometimes convenient to use single quotes instead of double
quotes. Various scripting languages parse single-quoted strings in various ways,
but I choose the TOML rule because it's simple and practically useful. TOML is
our config language, so copying the TOML syntax would be less surprising than
borrowing it from another language.
https://github.com/toml-lang/toml/issues/188
Previously, this command would work:
jj --config-toml='snapshot.max-new-file-size="1"' st
And is equivalent to this:
jj --config-toml='snapshot.max-new-file-size="1B"' st
But this would not work, despite looking like it should:
jj --config-toml='snapshot.max-new-file-size=1' st
This is extremely confusing for users.
This config value is deserialized via serde; and while the `HumanByteSize`
struct allegedly implemented Serde's `visit_u64` method, it was not called by
the deserialize visitor. Strangely, adding an `visit_i64` method *did* work, but
then requires handling of overflow, etc. This is likely because TOML integers
are naturally specified in `i64`.
Instead, just don't bother with any of that; implement a `TryFrom<String>`
instance for `HumanByteSize` that uses `u64::from_str` to try parsing the string
immediately; *then* fall back to `parse_human_byte_size` if that doesn't work.
This not only fixes the behavior but, IMO, is much simpler to reason about; we
get our `Deserialize` instance for free from the `TryFrom` instance.
Finally, this adjusts the test for `max-new-file-size` to now use a raw integer
literal, to ensure it doesn't regress. (There are already in-crate tests for
parsing the human readable strings.)
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: I8dafa2358d039ad1c07e9a512c1d10fed5845738
This fixes several issues that made working with empty files difficult using
the builtin diff editor.
1. The scm-record library used for the editor expects each file to have at
least one section. For new empty files this should be a file mode section. jj
wasn't rendering this mode section, which prevented empty files from being
selected at all.
2. The scm-record library returns `SelectedContents::Absent` if the file has no
contents after the diff editor is invoked. This can be because of several
reasons: 1) the file is new and empty; 2) the file was empty before and is
still empty; 3) the file has been deleted. Perhaps this is a bug in scm-record
and it should return `SelectedContents::Unchanged` or
`SelectedContents::Present` if the file hasn't been deleted. Until this is
patched upstream, we can work around it by disambiguating these cases.
See https://github.com/arxanas/scm-record/issues/26 for the upstream bug.
Fixes#3016
if `--use-destination-message/-u` is passed to `jj squash`, the resulting
revision will use the description of the destination revision and the
description(s) of the source revision(s) will be discarded.
If this doesn't work out, maybe we can try one of these:
a. fall back to bare file name if expression doesn't contain any operator-like
characters (e.g. "f(x" is an error, but "f x" can be parsed as bare string)
b. introduce command-line flag to opt in (e.g. -e FILESET)
c. introduce pattern prefix to opt in (e.g. set:FILESET)
Closes#3239, #2915, #2286
This command checks not only whether Watchman works, but also whether
it's enabled in the config. Also, the output is easier to understand
than that of the other `jj debug watchman` commands.
It would be nice if `jj debug watchman` called `jj debug watchman
status`, but it's not trivial in `clap` to have a default subcommand.
Ilya reported this in https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/issues/3483.
The bug was introduced in 976320726d.
Before this fix, `jj split` dropped any parents what weren't involved in the
split when it rebased the children of the commit being split. This meant that
any children which were merge commits lost their other parents unintentionally.
Fixes#3483
Before this commit `jj prev` fails if the current working copy commit is a
merge commit. After this commit it will prompt the user to choose the ancestor
they want to select.
#2126
