The `ChangeIdIndex` type is currently in defined in the `revset`
module because that's the only placed it's used. However, I'd like to
start using it directly from `index`. The idea is to make it possible
to create a `ChangeIdIndex` given a set of heads, without first
creating a `Revset`.
This isn't technically needed, but it prevents API misuse. Another option
is to do some compile-time substitution, but most callers are tests and the
runtime performance wouldn't matter.
The OpStore backends should have a better way to look up operation by id than
traversing from the op heads. The added method is similar to the commit Index
one, but returns an OpStoreResult because the backend operation can fail.
FWIW, if we want .shortest() in the op log template, we'll probably need a
trait method that returns an OpIndex instead.
I'm going to add try_from_hex(), which requires Self: Sized. Such trait bound
could be added, but I don't think we'll need abstracted ObjectId constructors
at all.
I'm going to add a prefix resolution method to OpStore, but OpStore is
unrelated to the index. I think ObjectId, HexPrefix, and PrefixResolution can
be extracted to this module.
This will be used in "jj op abandon ..op_id" command. The "op_id..@" range will
be reparented onto the root operation.
The current implementation is good enough for local repos, but it won't scale.
We might want to extract it as a trait method or introduce OpIndex for
efficient DAG operation.
Fixes#2760
Given the tree:
```
A-B-C
\
B2
```
And the command `jj rebase -s B -d B2`
We were previously marking B as abandoned, despite the comment stating that we were marking it as being succeeded by B2. This resulted in a call to `rewrite(rewrites={}, abandoned={B})` instead of `rewrite(rewrites={B=>B2}, abandoned={})`, which then made the new parent of `C` into `A` instead of `B2`
Finally, there are no test uses of these APIs. `DescendantRebaser` is made
`pub(crate)`, since it is used by `MutRepo`. Other functions are made private.
This completes the process of removing DescendantRebaser-related APIs from
tests. It requires creating some new test utils and a new
`rebase_descendants_with_option_return_map`.
This commit is a little out of place in this sequence, but
it seems to make more sense for MutRepo to own these maps.
@yuja [pointed out] that any tests written using `create_descendant_rebaser` now
need to do this cleanup, but there are no longer any such tests after the
previous commits and a follow-up commit removes `create_descendant_rebaser`
entirely.
[pointed out]: https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/2737#discussion_r1435754370
This removes uses of `DescendantRebaser::new` or
`MutRepo::create_descendant_rebaser` from most tests. The exceptions are the
tests having to do with abandoning empty commits on rebase, since adjusting
those is a bit more elaborate (see follow-up commits).
A possible use case is when doing some archaeology around a certain operation.
The current implementation is quadratic if + is repeated. Suppose op_id is
usually close to the current op heads, I think it'll practically work better
than building a reverse lookup table.
This removes CommandError dependency from these resolution functions. We might
want to refactor the error types again if we introduce a real "opset" evaluator.
The error message for unresolved op heads now includes "@" instead of the whole
expression.
The resolver callback usually returns wider error type, which I don't think
is a variant of OpHeadResolutionError.
To help type inference, resolver's error type is E, not E1 where E: From<E1>.
If the commit backend has high latency, it can make a big difference
to read files concurrently. This patch updates the working copy code
to do that in the update code (when reading files from the backend to
write to the working copy). Because our backend at Google reads files
from a local daemon process that already does a lot of prefetching,
this patch doesn't actually help us. I think it's still the right
thing to do for backends that don't do the same kind of
prefetching. It speeds up `jj sparse set --add` by >10x when I disable
the prefetching in our daemon (our `Backend::concurrency()` is 100).
My jj repo contains such head commits, and "jj debug reindex" fails. To address
this problem, we'll probably need to implement GC, and the user will discard
operations before the first bad op id.
I'm going to add a public method that rebuilds index, and its return type will
be different. I also added "build_" because "index" could be misinterpreted
as noun.
The method arguments are reordered to follow the public IndexStore interface.
The error types are shared with the commit store backend. We could add per-store
error types, but it's unlikely that the caller needs to discriminate them.
I think the idea behind `handle_ancestor_ops()` was to let our backend
at Google delegate the work to the server, which could then avoid
walking ancestors. However, we're now thinking that we're going to
make our server resolve divergent operations on its own instead, so
the client will never see more than one op head, unless it manually
creates the second op head itself (e.g. because the user ran two
concurrent commands). In those cases it should be fine to do the
walk. So let's simplify the trait by removing the function.
Consider how one would implment the current `OpHeadsStore` interface
for a cloud-based backend. After `OpHeadsStore::add_op_head()` is
called, the set of op heads temporarily contains two heads (typically)
until `OpHeadsStore::remove_op_head()` is called. That's not invalid,
but it's annoying to have to deal with that state more than
necessary. Also, it's unnecessarily inefficient to send the addition
and removal of op heads as separate RPCs. This patch therefore adds a
`update_op_heads()` method that takes a list of old heads to remove
and a single new head to add. Coming patches will start migrating to
that method.
We move `.jj/repo/op_heads/*` into `.jj/repo/op_heads/heads/*` almost
a year ago, in commits 90a66ec262 and 37ba17589d. We said we would
drop support for it in 0.9+. I think we said that before we started
doing monthly releases, but I we're still past the goal of 6 months
(which is what I think we were aiming for).
I'll probably add change id lookup methods to CompositeIndex. The Index trait
won't gain resolve_change_id_prefix(), but I also renamed its resolve_prefix()
for consistency.
Since Readonly/MutableIndexSegment no longer implement Index trait, there's
no ambiguity between segment-local and index-global operations. Let's shorten
the method names.
I'm thinking of changing some IndexSegment methods to return LocalPosition
instead of global IndexPosition, and using u32 there would be a source of bugs.
Both readonly and mutable segments know the commit ids to return, and the
caller only needs the ids. Since segment_commit_id(local_pos) scans the graph
entries, doing that would increase the chance of cache miss.
