According to the doc, this is compatible with the map syntax.
https://protobuf.dev/programming-guides/proto3/#maps
This change means that the serialized file states are sorted by RepoPath,
so BTreeMap<RepoPath, _> can be reconstructed with fewer cache misses.
In my "linux" repo (watchman enabled):
- jj-0: baseline
- jj-1: this
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 10 -L bin jj-0,jj-1,jj-2 \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux status"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
Time (mean ± σ): 1.034 s ± 0.020 s [User: 0.881 s, System: 0.212 s]
Range (min … max): 1.011 s … 1.068 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
Time (mean ± σ): 849.3 ms ± 13.8 ms [User: 710.7 ms, System: 199.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 821.7 ms … 870.2 ms 10 runs
Relative speed comparison
1.32 ± 0.04 target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
1.08 ± 0.03 target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
Cache-misses got reduced:
% perf stat -e task-clock,cycles,instructions,cache-references,cache-misses \
-- ./target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux --no-pager status
1,091.68 msec task-clock # 1.032 CPUs utilized
4,179,596,978 cycles # 3.829 GHz
6,166,231,489 instructions # 1.48 insn per cycle
134,032,047 cache-references # 122.776 M/sec
29,322,707 cache-misses # 21.88% of all cache refs
1.057474164 seconds time elapsed
0.897042000 seconds user
0.194819000 seconds sys
% perf stat -e task-clock,cycles,instructions,cache-references,cache-misses \
-- ./target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux --no-pager status
927.05 msec task-clock # 1.083 CPUs utilized
3,451,299,198 cycles # 3.723 GHz
6,222,418,272 instructions # 1.80 insn per cycle
98,499,363 cache-references # 106.251 M/sec
11,998,523 cache-misses # 12.18% of all cache refs
0.855938336 seconds time elapsed
0.720568000 seconds user
0.207924000 seconds sys
The working copy's current tree tracks whether a file is a
conflict. We also track that in the `TreeState` object. That allows us
to not read the trees object to decide if we should try to parse a
file as a conflict.
One disadvantage is that it's redundant information that needs to be
kept in sync with the tree object. Also, for Watchman, we would like
to completely ignore the persisted `FileState`.
This commit removes the `FileType::Conflict` variant and instead
checks in the tree object whether a given path was a conflict. This is
the change I mentioned in dc8a207737. We still skip the check
completely if the file's mtime etc. is unchanged, so it shouldn't have
much effect in the common case of a mostly unchanged working copy. I
measured a slowdown on `jj diff` by ~3% in the Linux repo with a clean
working copy with all mtimes bumped. I think the simpler code and
reduced risk of subtle bugs is worth the performance hit.
This prepares for allowing the base tree to be a conflict at the
root-tree level (#1624).
We could remove the `Conflict` variant completely. I tried doing that
and it slowed down `jj diff` by ~3% in the Linux repo with a clean
working copy with only mtime bumped on all files.
I've preferred "working-copy commit" over "checkout" for a while
because I think it's clearer, but there were lots of places still
using "checkout". I've left "checkout" in places where it refers to
the action of updating the working copy or the working-copy commit.
A new FileType, GitSubmodule is added which is ignored. Files or
directories having this type are not added to the work queue and
are ignored in snapshot. Submodules are not created by jujutsu
when resetting or checking out a tree, they should be currently
managed using git.
Let's acknowledge everyone's contributions by replacing "Google LLC"
in the copyright header by "The Jujutsu Authors". If I understand
correctly, it won't have any legal effect, but maybe it still helps
reduce concerns from contributors (though I haven't heard any
concerns).
Google employees can read about Google's policy at
go/releasing/contributions#copyright.
I was reading a draft of "Git Rev News: Edition 91" [1] where Peff
mentions some unfinished patches to allow negative timestamps in
Git. So I figured I should add support for that before I forget. I
haven't checked if libgit2 supports it, so it might be that our Git
backend still doesn't support it after this patch.
[1] https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-91.md
`wc_commit` seems clearer than `checkout` and not too much longer. I
considered `working_copy` but it was less clear (could be the path to
the working copy, or an instance of `WorkingCopy`). I also considered
`working_copy_commit`, but that seems a bit too long.
