It's inconsistent that some warnings have headings and some don't, and it seems
the choice is arbitrary. Let's unify the style. There are two exceptions:
1. continued line following labeled message,
2. "unrecognized response" followed by prompt.
The lowercase "warning: " is unified to "Warning: " as it is the jj's
convention afaik.
The _default() suffix could be dropped from these methods, but it's probably
better to break the existing codebase for the moment. Otherwise, the caller
might do writeln!(ui.warning(), "Warning: ..").
As requested in #1471, I added a new flag for `jj branch list` to only show branches that are conflicted.
Adds a unit test to check for listing only conflicted branches and regenerates the cli output to incorporate the new flag.
Closes#1471
reformat
Add an option to list tracked branches only
This option keeps most of the current `--all` printing logic, but:
- Omits local Git-tracking branches by default (can be extended to
support filtering by remote).
- Skip over the branch altogether if it doesn't contain tracked remotes
- Don't print the untracked_remote_refs at the end
Usage:
`jj branch list -t`
`jj branch list --tracked`
`jj branch list --tracked <branch name>`
this greatly speeds up the time to run all tests, at the cost of slightly larger recompile times for individual tests.
this unfortunately adds the requirement that all tests are listed in `runner.rs` for the crate.
to avoid forgetting, i've added a new test that ensures the directory is in sync with the file.
## benchmarks
before this change, recompiling all tests took 32-50 seconds and running a single test took 3.5 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 3.543 s ± 0.168 s [User: 2.597 s, System: 1.262 s]
Range (min … max): 3.400 s … 3.847 s 10 runs
```
after this change, recompiling all tests take 4 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs ; cargo t --test runner --no-run'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.055 s ± 0.123 s [User: 3.591 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.804 s … 4.159 s 10 runs
```
and running a single test takes about the same:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test runner -- test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.129 s ± 0.120 s [User: 3.636 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.933 s … 4.346 s 10 runs
```
about 1.4 seconds of that is the time for the runner, of which .4 is the time for the linker. so
there may be room for further improving the times.
The count() function in this trait is used by "jj branch" to determine
(and then report) how many commits a certain branch is ahead/behind
another branch. This is currently implemented by walking all commits
in the revset, counting how many were encountered. But this could be
improved: if the number is large, it is probably sufficient to report
"at least N" (instead of walking all the way), and this does not scale
well to jj backends that may not have all commits present locally (which
may prefer to return an estimate, rather than access the network).
Therefore, add a function that is explicitly documented to be O(1)
and that can return a range of values if the backend so chooses.
Also remove count(), as it is not immediately obvious that it is an
expensive call, and callers that are willing to pay the cost can obtain
the exact same functionality through iter().count() anyway. (In this
commit, all users of count() are migrated to iter().count() to preserve
all existing functionality; they will be migrated to count_estimate() in
a subsequent commit.)
"branch" needed to be updated due to this change. Although jj
is currently only available in English, I have attempted to keep
user-visible text from being assembled piece by piece, so that if we
later decide to translate jj into other languages, things will be easier
for translators.
This is really a simple change that does the following in a transaction:
* Set the new branch name to point to the same commit as the old branch name.
* Set the old branch name to point to no commit (hence deleting the old name).
Before it starts, it confirms that the new branch name is not already in use.
This tries to clarify the fact that the branches must be remote and the syntax
for specifying them as globs.
Cc @yuja, https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/2625#discussion_r1423379351
Here is the result (excerpt):
```
$ jj branch track --help
Start tracking given remote branches
A tracking remote branch will be imported as a local branch of the same name. Changes to it
will propagate to the existing local branch on future pulls.
Usage: jj branch track [OPTIONS] <BRANCH@REMOTE>...
Arguments:
<BRANCH@REMOTE>...
Remote branches to track
By default, the specified name matches exactly. Use `glob:` prefix to select
branches by wildcard pattern. For details, see
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/blob/main/docs/revsets.md#string-patterns.
Examples: branch@remote, glob:main@*, glob:jjfan-*@upstream
```
Per discussion in https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/discussions/2555. I'm
okay with either way, but it's confusing if we had "branch create" and
"branch set" and both of these could create a new branch.
Like "jj log PATHS...", unmatched name isn't an error. I don't think
"jj branch list glob:'push-*'" should fail just because there are no in-flight
PR branches.
If we add glob support, users will probably want to do something like
'jj branch untrack glob:"*@origin"'. It would be annoying if the command
failed just because one of the remote branches has already been untracked.
Since branch tracking/untracking is idempotent, it's safe to continue in
those cases.
The parse rule is lax compared to revset. We could require the pattern to be
quoted, but that would mean glob patterns have to be quoted like 'glob:"foo*"'.
I personally don't mind if "jj branch list" showed all non-tracking branches,
but I agree it would be a mess if ~500 remote branches were listed. So let's
hide them by default as non-tracking branches aren't so interesting.
Closes#1136
This will be the option to include non-tracking remote branches. We could add
more fine-grained filtering flags, but I think --all is good enough and easier
to remember.
This patch also updates many of the test outputs to include synchronized remote
branches. I think verbose outputs will help catch future bugs.
This patch adds MutableRepo::track_remote_branch() as we'll probably need to
track the default branch on "jj git clone". untrack_remote_branch() is also
added for consistency.
I've added a boolean flag to the store to ensure that the migration never runs
more than once after the view gets "op restore"-d. I'll probably reorganize the
branches structure to support non-tracking branches later, but updating the
storage format in a single commit would be too involved.
If jj is downgraded, these "git" remote refs would be exported to the Git repo.
Users might have to remove them manually.
I think most users who change the set of immutable heads away from
`trunk() | tags()` are going to also want to change the default log
revset to include the newly mutable commit and to exclude the newly
immutable commits. So let's update the default log revset to use
`immutable_heads()` instead.
`test_templater` changed because we have overridden the set of
immutable commits there so `jj log` now includes the remote branch.
This adds a new `revset-aliases.immutable_heads()s` config for
defining the set of immutable commits. The set is defined as the
configured revset, as well as its ancestors, and the root commit
commit (even if the configured set is empty).
This patch also adds enforcement of the config where we already had
checks preventing rewrite of the root commit. The working-copy commit
is implicitly assumed to be writable in most cases. Specifically, we
won't prevent amending the working copy even if the user includes it
in the config but we do prevent `jj edit @` in that case. That seems
good enough to me. Maybe we should emit a warning when the working
copy is in the set of immutable commits.
Maybe we should add support for something more like [Mercurial's
phases](https://wiki.mercurial-scm.org/Phases), which is propagated on
push and pull. There's already some affordance for that in the view
object's `public_heads` field. However, this is simpler, especially
since we can't propagate the phase to Git remotes, and seems like a
good start. Also, it lets you say that commits authored by other users
are immutable, for example.
For now, the functionality is in the CLI library. I'm not sure if we
want to move it into the library crate. I'm leaning towards letting
library users do whatever they want without being restricted by
immutable commits. I do think we should move the functionality into a
future `ui-lib` or `ui-util` crate. That crate would have most of the
functionality in the current `cli_util` module (but in a
non-CLI-specific form).
This basically means that heads in a filtered graph appear in reverse
chronological order. Before, "jj log -r 'tags()'" in linux-stable repo would
look randomly sorted once you ran "jj debug reindex" in it.
With this change, indexing is more like breadth-first search, and BFS is
known to be bad at rendering nice graph (because branches run in parallel.)
However, we have a post process to group topological branches, so we don't
have this problem. For serialization formats like Mercurial's revlog iirc,
BFS leads to bad compression ratio, but our index isn't that kind of data.
Reindexing gets slightly slower, but I think this is negligible.
(in Git repository)
% hyperfine --warmup 3 --runs 10 "jj debug reindex --ignore-working-copy"
(original)
Time (mean ± σ): 1.521 s ± 0.027 s [User: 1.307 s, System: 0.211 s]
Range (min … max): 1.486 s … 1.573 s 10 runs
(new)
Time (mean ± σ): 1.568 s ± 0.027 s [User: 1.368 s, System: 0.197 s]
Range (min … max): 1.531 s … 1.625 s 10 runs
Another idea is to sort heads chronologically and run DFS-based topological
sorting. It's ad-hoc, but worked surprisingly well for my local repositories.
For repositories with lots of long-running branches, this commit will provide
more predictable result than DFS-based one.
