Yuya Nishihara c88e69ad6f git_backend: replace git2::Repository with gix::Repository ... My gut feeling is that gitoxide aims to be more transparent than libgit2. We'll need to know more about the underlying Git data model. Random comments on gix API: * gix::Repository provides API similar to git2::Repository, but has less "convenient" functions. For example, we need to use .find_object() + .try_to/into_<kind>() instead of .find_<kind>(). * gix::Object, Blob, etc. own raw data as bytes. gix::object and gix::objs types provide high-level views on such data. * Tree building is pretty low-level compared to git2. * gix leverages bstr (i.e. bytes) extensively. It's probably not difficult to migrate git::import/export_refs(). It might help eliminate the startup overhead of libssl initialization. The gix-based GitBackend appears to be a bit faster, but that wouldn't practically matter. #2316		2023-11-02 19:33:06 +09:00
..
examples	backend: make read_conflict synchronous again	2023-10-28 16:45:40 -07:00
src	formatter: reset colors on early drop	2023-11-01 21:41:25 -07:00
testing
tests	git_backend: replace git2::Repository with gix::Repository	2023-11-02 19:33:06 +09:00
build.rs
Cargo.toml
LICENSE