Yuya Nishihara c88e69ad6f git_backend: replace git2::Repository with gix::Repository ... My gut feeling is that gitoxide aims to be more transparent than libgit2. We'll need to know more about the underlying Git data model. Random comments on gix API: * gix::Repository provides API similar to git2::Repository, but has less "convenient" functions. For example, we need to use .find_object() + .try_to/into_<kind>() instead of .find_<kind>(). * gix::Object, Blob, etc. own raw data as bytes. gix::object and gix::objs types provide high-level views on such data. * Tree building is pretty low-level compared to git2. * gix leverages bstr (i.e. bytes) extensively. It's probably not difficult to migrate git::import/export_refs(). It might help eliminate the startup overhead of libssl initialization. The gix-based GitBackend appears to be a bit faster, but that wouldn't practically matter. #2316		2023-11-02 19:33:06 +09:00
..
benches
gen-protos
src	git_backend: replace git2::Repository with gix::Repository	2023-11-02 19:33:06 +09:00
tests	merged_tree: propagate backend errors in diff iterator	2023-10-26 06:20:56 -07:00
testutils	tests: force gitoxide to not load config nor use "main" as default branch	2023-11-02 19:33:06 +09:00
Cargo.toml	cargo: add gitoxide (or gix) dependency	2023-11-02 19:33:06 +09:00
LICENSE	cargo: add LICENSE file to each crate we publish	2023-09-22 21:48:28 -07:00