jj/testing
Yuya Nishihara 982062bd75 revset: do not always evaluate filter node to InternalRevset
This basically removes hidden 'all() &' from union/negation of filters. To
achieve that, I have two options: 1. add separate evaluation path (like the
one this commit introduced), or 2. wrap "all()" revset to override predicate
as Box::new(|_| true) function. I took the former since it's less ad-hoc.

We can add an explicit RevsetExpression node to branch between evaluate()
and evaluate_predicate(), but I don't think it would simplify the
implementation at this point. We might need such node if we want to resolve
"all()" at resolve_symbols(). It might be even better to extract a subset of
RevsetExpression enum, which only contains evaluatable nodes.

The cost of 'all() &' isn't significant for most filters. '~merges()' is
the exception. For jj repo,

    revsets/:v0.3.0 & (author(martinvonz) | committer(martinvonz))
    --------------------------------------------------------------
    base     1.06      11.2±0.04m
    new      1.00      10.5±0.05m

    revsets/~merges()
    -----------------
    base     1.69     750.0±8.47µ
    new      1.00     444.1±3.50µ
2023-04-04 15:21:21 +09:00
..
bench-revsets-git.txt revset: do not always evaluate filter node to InternalRevset 2023-04-04 15:21:21 +09:00
fake-diff-editor.rs cleanup: let new Clippy move variables into format strings 2022-12-14 21:30:58 -08:00
fake-editor.rs Add a config edit command to open jj config in editor 2023-01-12 01:10:07 -06:00