This makes it at least scroll again, but it doesn't scroll down to the
last element yet. We haven't figured out why yet.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Co-authored-by: Bennet <bennet@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Antonio <antonio@zed.dev>
This pull request introduces a new `markdown` crate which is capable of
parsing and rendering a Markdown source. One of the key additions is
that it enables text selection within a `Markdown` view. Eventually,
this will replace `RichText` but for now the goal is to use it in the
assistant revamped assistant in the spirit of making progress.
<img width="711" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/assets/482957/b56c777b-e57c-42f9-95c1-3ada22f63a69">
Note that this pull request doesn't yet use the new markdown renderer in
`assistant2`. This is because we need to modify the assistant before
slotting in the new renderer and I wanted to merge this independently of
those changes.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Sobo <nathan@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Alp <akeles@umd.edu>
Co-authored-by: Zachiah Sawyer <zachiah@proton.me>
This PR makes the `border` methods require an explicit width instead of
defaulting to 1px.
This breaks convention with Tailwind, but it makes GPUI more consistent
with itself. We already have an edge case where the parameterized method
had to be named `border_width`, since `border` was taken up by an alias
for the 1px variant.
### Before
```rs
div()
.border()
.border_t()
.border_r()
.border_b()
.border_l()
.border_width(px(7.))
```
### After
```rs
div()
.border_1()
.border_t_1()
.border_r_1()
.border_b_1()
.border_l_1()
.border(px(7.))
```
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR renames the `overflow_hidden_x` and `overflow_hidden_y` methods
to `overflow_x_hidden` and `overflow_y_hidden`, respectively.
This provides consistency with our `overflow_x_scroll` /
`overflow_y_scroll` methods, as well as better matches Tailwind's
naming.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR renames the `h_stack` and `v_stack` to `h_flex` and `v_flex`,
respectively.
We were previously using `h_stack` and `v_stack` to match SwiftUI, but
`h_flex` and `v_flex` fit better with the web/flexbox terminology that
the rest of GPUI uses.
Additionally, we were already calling the utility functions used to
implement `h_stack` and `v_stack` by the new names.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This makes it a bit more approachable to implement.
This required converting the state of Component to AnyElement, which
costs an allocation. I'm hoping this will be ok performance-wise now
that AnyElements use bump allocation, but I need to benchmark still.
This PR extracts the `Story` component into a separate `story` crate so
that it can be shared among various crates that define stories.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Nate Butler <iamnbutler@gmail.com>
