I saved the `file_types.json` file and got a diff because it had some
trailing whitespace. I ran
[`lineman`](https://github.com/JosephTLyons/lineman) on the codebase.
I've done this before, but this time, I've added in the following
settings to our `.zed` local settings, to make sure every future save
respects our desire to have consistent whitespace formatting.
```json
"remove_trailing_whitespace_on_save": true,
"ensure_final_newline_on_save": true
```
Release Notes:
- N/A
Release Notes:
- Fixed `cgn` backwards movement problem in #9982
There are two issues:
- When there are no more matches, the next repetition still moves the
cursor to the left. After that, the recording is cleared. For this I
simply move the cursor to the right, but it doesn't work when the cursor
is at the end of the line.
- If `cgn` is used when there are no matches, it cleans the previous
recorded actions. Maybe there should be a way to revert the recording.
This also happens when using `c` and `esc`
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
Fixes: #10266
Release Notes:
- Added/Fixed/Improved ...
([#<public_issue_number_if_exists>](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/<public_issue_number_if_exists>)).
Optionally, include screenshots / media showcasing your addition that
can be included in the release notes.
**or**
- N/A
Release Notes:
- Resolves#4273
@algora-pbc /claim #4273
This is a work-in-progress. The process for `gn` command is:
- maintain updated vim.workspace_state.search.initial_query
- modify editor.select_next_state with
vim.workspace_state.search.initial_query
- use editor.select_next()
- merge selections
- set editor.select_next_state to previous state
To make this possible, several private members and editor structures are
made public. `gN` is not yet implemented and the cursor still does not
jump to the next selection in the first use.
Maybe there is an better way to do this?
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
For #4440, I've only added support for normal, if it's visual mode,
would we like this to delete the current selection row and enter insert
mode?
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
The important change here is to ensure that undo never lands you in
visual mode; but we also take care to restore the selection the same way
vim does (visual line goes to beginning of line, visual block to the top
left, etc.).
To help make this behaviour feel right we also group any deletions that
started insert mode with the first text inserted.
Fixes: #7521
Release Notes:
- vim: Improved undo. It will now restore you to normal mode in the same
position as vim, and group deletions caused by `c` or `s` with the
concomitant insert.
([#7521](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7521)).
This PR adds support for `ap`/`ip` text objects in Vim mode and allows
users to perform paragraph-based operations.
Cases where compatibility with Neovim's behavior is checked, cases where
there are known differences in behavior with Neovim (cases where the
landing position is other than the beginning of the line), and cases
where the Neovim behavior in the test suite seems strange are separated
in the test code so that they can be identified.
Release Notes:
- Added support for `ap` and `ip` paragraph text objects in Vim mode
([#7359](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/7359)).
Activated by keystrokes g-e.
Release Notes:
- vim: Added `ge` and `gE` for go to Previous Word End.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com>
This was originally just to fix
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4354, which I did by just
returning the previous offset in `find_boundary`.. but `find_boundary`
is used in the "insert mode" / normal editor too, so returning the
previous boundary breaks existing functionality in that case.
I was considering a new `find_boundary` function just for some of the
vim motions like this, but I thought that this is straightforward enough
and future Vim functions might need similar logic too.
Release Notes:
- Fixed https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4354
This fixes `t` not being repeatable with `,` and `;` in normal mode.
Release Notes:
- Fixed `t` in Vim mode not being repeatable with `,` or `;`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Conrad <conrad@zed.dev>
This change implements the vim
[motion](https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/runtime/doc/motion.txt)
commands to move the cursor to the top, middle and bottom of the visible
view. This feature is requested in
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4941.
This change takes inspiration from
[crates/vim/src/normal/scroll.rs](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/vim/src/normal/scroll.rs).
A note on the behavior of these commands: Because
`NeovimBackedTestContext` requires compatibility with nvim, the current
implementation causes slightly non-standard behavior: it causes the
editor to scroll a few lines. The standard behavior causes no scrolling.
It is easy enough to account for the margin by adding
`VERTICAL_SCROLL_MARGIN`. However, doing so will cause test failures due
to the disparity between nvim and zed states. Perhaps
`NeovimBackedTestContext` should have a switch to be more tolerant for
such cases.
Release Notes:
- Added support for moving to top, middle and bottom of the screen in
vim mode (`H`, `M`, and `L`)
([#4941](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/4941)).
Closes#4358
The bug originates on this line:
5db7e8f89e/crates/vim/src/motion.rs (L451)
- When running "dtx" on "ˇabcx", the range to delete is 0 -> 2 ("abc")
- When running "dtx" on "abˇcx", the range to delete is 2 -> 2 ("c"), so
`new_point == point` and the function incorrectly returns `None` and "c"
is not deleted
- We need to disambiguate between the "not found" case and the "found
immediately to the right" case
- This bug does not apply to the backwards case ("dTx")
Release Notes:
- Fixed "dtx" vim key combination when "x" is immediately to the right
of the cursor (#4358)
Before this change up and down were in display co-ordinates, after this
change they are in fold coordinates (which matches the vim behaviour).
To make this work without causing usabliity problems, a bunch of extra
keyboard shortcuts now work:
- vim: `z {o,c}` to open,close a fold
- vim: `z f` to fold current visual selection
- vim: `g {j,k,up,down}` to move up/down a display line
- vim: `g {0,^,$,home,end}` to get to start/end of a display line
Fixes: zed-industries/community#1562
- vim: support P for paste before
- vim: support P in visual mode for paste without overriding clipboard
- vim: fix position when using `p` on text copied outside zed
- vim: fix indentation when using `p` on text copied from zed
This isn't quite an exact emulation, as instead of using one selection
that is magically in "column mode", we emulate it with a bunch of zed
multi-selections (one per line).
I think this is better, as it requires fewer changes to the codebase,
and lets you see the impact of any changes immediately on all lines.
Fixes: zed-industries/community#984
These primarily happen when first entering visual mode, but can also
be created with objects like `vi{`.
Along the way fix the way ranges like `vi{` are selected to be more
similar to nvim.
Added .assert_shared_state() to NeovimBackedTestContext – although it's
not strictly necessary to show the expected behaviour in the test file
(as we can just compare to neovim's JSON recording), it makes it much
easier to understand what we're testing.
