Release Notes:
- Added Diagnostic information to inline assistant. This enables users
to just say "Fix this" and have the model know what the errors are.
This PR reverts #16145 and subsequent changes.
This reverts commit a515442a36.
We still have issues with our approach to indentation in Python
unfortunately, but this feels like a safer equilibrium than where we
were.
Release Notes:
- Returned to our previous prompt for inline assist transformations,
since recent changes were introducing issues.
Fixed the output format section of the content_prompt.hbs template
getting rendered away by handlebars. Also fixed a leftover hardcoded
"Rust" in the rewrite section snippet. (follow-up to #16333)
Release Notes:
- N/A
I focused on cases where we're inserting doc comments or annotations
above symbols.
I added 5 new examples to the content generation prompt, covering
various scenarios:
1. Inserting documentation for a Rust struct
2. Writing docstrings for a Python class
3. Adding comments to a TypeScript method
4. Adding a derive attribute to a Rust struct
5. Adding a decorator to a Python class
These examples demonstrate how to handle different languages and common
tasks like adding documentation, attributes, and decorators.
To improve context integration, I've made the following changes:
1. Added a `transform_context_range` that includes 3 lines before and
after the transform range
2. Introduced `rewrite_section_prefix` and `rewrite_section_suffix` to
provide more context around the section being rewritten
3. Updated the prompt template to include this additional context in a
separate code snippet
Release Notes:
- Reduced instances of over-generation when inserting docs or
annotations above a symbol.
…#16184)"
This reverts commit c3edbd7d9a, which
caused a regression that leaked chatter into inline assist replacements
and <rewrite_this> tags into insertions.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Some prompt changes to highlight:
- Removes `<rewrite_section>` rendering, preferring to just show
`<rewrite_section_with_selections>`
- Concise, terse instructions throughout
I'd like to have experimented with prefilling the assistant response,
but I don't think OpenAI allows for that and wouldn't want to break
compatibility with gpt-4 et al.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR simplifies our approach to indentation in the inline assistant
in hopes of improving our experience for Python. We tell the model to
generate the correct indentation in the prompt, and always start
generating at the start of the line. This may fall down for less capable
models, but I want to get a solid experience on the best models and then
figure the rest out later.
Also: We now prefer `./assets/prompts` as an overrides directory when
stdout is a PTY, so you can do `cargo run` and then iterate prompts for
the current run inside the current working copy.
cc @trishume @dsp-ant
Release Notes:
- Zed now allows the model to control indentation when performing inline
transformation. We're hoping this improves the indentation experience in
Python and other indentation-sensitive languages, but it does require
more from the model.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mikayla <mikayla@zed.dev>
I need this to refine our prompts on the fly as I work.
Release Notes:
- Templates for prompts driving inline transformation in editors and the
terminal can now be overridden in the `~/.config/zed/prompts/templates`
directory. This is an advanced feature, and prevents you from getting
upstream changes. It's intended for use by Zed developers.
