This PR decouples `call2` from `workspace2` in order to improve our
compile times.
Why pick such a small, innocent crate as `call`? It depends on
`live_kit_client`, which is not-so-innocent and is in fact stalling our
clean builds.
In this PR, `call2` depends on `workspace2`; workspace crate defines a
`CallHandler` trait for which the implementation resides in `call`; it
it then all tied together in `zed`, which passes a factory of `Box<dyn
CallHandler>` into workspace's `AppState`.
Clean debug build before this change: ~1m45s
Clean debug build after this change: ~1m25s
Clean release build before this change: ~6m30s
Clean release build after this change: ~4m30s
~Gonna follow up with release timings where I expect the change to be
more impactful (as this allows 2/3 of the infamous trio of
"project-workspace-editor" long pole to proceed quicker, without being
blocked on live-kit-client build script)~.
This should have little effect (if any) in incremental scenarios, where
live_kit_client is already built.
[release
timings.zip](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/files/13431121/release.timings.zip)
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR reworks the `ListItem` component to accept `children` rather
than just a `Label`.
This is a step towards making the `ListItem` component more open.
As part of this the `ContextMenu` was simplified to only construct the
various list components in `render` rather than holding them as part of
its state.
Release Notes:
- N/A
It looks like we should keep RUSTFLAGS consistent in CI if possible;
some commands augmented RUSTFLAGS with "-D warnings" which overrode
`.cargo/config.toml`, causing unnecessary rebuilds even for non-bundling
runs. Tl;dr: for the last few days our average CI time spiked
significantly.
There are several solutions:
- We can place `-D warnings` in our `.cargo/config.toml`. That's not a
good solution, because then you wouldn't ever be able to build Zed with
warnings locally. A true PITA!
- We can place another config.toml somewhere in the search path
(https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/config.html#hierarchical-structure)
and rely on the merging of properties. That way we can avoid having `-D
warnings` on developer machines while being able to override CI
behaviour at will.
This PR implements the latter approach by creating the new config file
manually. Ideally we should have it a a separate file in repository
that's moved into $HOME/.cargo on each CI run. Maybe we should even
place it somewhere more local to the checked out Zed version, as placing
it in a global spot is kinda bad too - what if we start building
multiple cargo projects on our CI machines?
Release Notes:
- N/A
