ok/jj
1
0
Fork 0
forked from mirrors/jj
Code Pull requests Activity

test_conflicts and test_resolve_command: use indoc! to indent conflict markers in tests

Browse source 
Apart from (IMO) looking nicer, this will also sidestep the potential problem
that if the file contains actual jj conflict markers (`>>>>>>>` in the beginning
of a line, for example), jj would currently have trouble materializing and
subsequently parsing conflicts in the file if it actually became conflicted.

I'll demo this bug in either this or a subsequent PR. It's the kind of bug that
sounds serious in theory but might never cause a problem in practice.

After this PR, only `docs/tutorial.md` has a conflict marker that's not indented.
There's only one there, so hopefully it won't be too much of a pain to deal with.

I also indented other strings in `test_conflicts.rs`. IMO, this looks nice and
more consistent with the `insta::assert_snapshot` output. I didn't spend the
time to do the same for `test_resolve_command`.
This commit is contained in:
Ilya Grigoriev 2024-03-22 19:34:28 -07:00
parent d8c84940d9
commit 02a04d0d37
6 changed files with 187 additions and 159 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
Cargo.lock generated
View file

@ -1688,6 +1688,7 @@ dependencies = [
"gix",
"hex",
"indexmap",
"indoc",
"insta",
"itertools 0.12.1",
"jj-cli",
@ -1739,6 +1740,7 @@ dependencies = [
"glob",
"hex",
"ignore",
"indoc",
"insta",
"itertools 0.12.1",
"jj-lib-proc-macros",

1
Cargo.toml
View file

@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ glob = "0.3.1"
hex = "0.4.3"
ignore = "0.4.20"
indexmap = "2.2.5"
indoc = "2.0.4"
insta = { version = "1.35.1", features = ["filters"] }
itertools = "0.12.1"
libc = { version = "0.2.153" }

1
cli/Cargo.toml
View file

@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ anyhow = { workspace = true }
assert_cmd = { workspace = true }
assert_matches = { workspace = true }
async-trait = { workspace = true }
indoc = { workspace = true }
insta = { workspace = true }
test-case = { workspace = true }
testutils = { workspace = true }

40
cli/tests/test_resolve_command.rs
View file

@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
use std::path::Path;
use indoc::indoc;
use crate::common::TestEnvironment;
fn create_commit(
@ -195,15 +197,16 @@ fn test_resolution() {
&editor_script,
[
"dump editor2",
"write
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
-some
+fake
+++++++
conflict
>>>>>>>
",
indoc! {"
write
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
-some
+fake
+++++++
conflict
>>>>>>>
"},
]
.join("\0"),
)
@ -270,15 +273,16 @@ conflict
&editor_script,
[
"dump editor3",
"write
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
-some
+fake
+++++++
conflict
>>>>>>>
",
indoc! {"
write
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
-some
+fake
+++++++
conflict
>>>>>>>
"},
]
.join("\0"),
)

1
lib/Cargo.toml
View file

@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ winreg = { workspace = true }
assert_matches = { workspace = true }
criterion = { workspace = true }
esl01-renderdag = { workspace = true }
indoc = { workspace = true }
insta = { workspace = true }
num_cpus = { workspace = true }
pretty_assertions = { workspace = true }

301
lib/tests/test_conflicts.rs
View file

@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
use indoc::indoc;
use jj_lib::backend::FileId;
use jj_lib::conflicts::{
extract_as_single_hunk, materialize_merge_result, parse_conflict, update_from_content,
@ -32,34 +33,37 @@ fn test_materialize_conflict_basic() {
let base_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
"},
);
let left_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
line 4
line 5
"},
);
let right_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
right 3.1
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
right 3.1
line 4
line 5
"},
);
// The left side should come first. The diff should be use the smaller (right)
@ -122,37 +126,41 @@ fn test_materialize_conflict_multi_rebase_conflicts() {
let base_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2 base
line 3
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2 base
line 3
"},
);
let a_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2 a.1
line 2 a.2
line 2 a.3
line 3
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2 a.1
line 2 a.2
line 2 a.3
line 3
"},
);
let b_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2 b.1
line 2 b.2
line 3
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2 b.1
line 2 b.2
line 3
"},
);
let c_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2 c.1
line 3
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2 c.1
line 3
"},
);
// The order of (a, b, c) should be preserved. For all cases, the "a" side
@ -240,32 +248,35 @@ fn test_materialize_parse_roundtrip() {
let base_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
"},
);
let left_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1 left
line 2 left
line 3
line 4
line 5 left
",
indoc! {"
line 1 left
line 2 left
line 3
line 4
line 5 left
"},
);
let right_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1 right
line 2
line 3
line 4 right
line 5 right
",
indoc! {"
line 1 right
line 2
line 3
line 4 right
line 5 right
"},
);
let conflict = Merge::from_removes_adds(
@ -335,31 +346,34 @@ fn test_materialize_conflict_modify_delete() {
let base_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
"},
);
let modified_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
modified
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
modified
line 4
line 5
"},
);
let deleted_id = testutils::write_file(
store,
path,
"line 1
line 2
line 4
line 5
",
indoc! {"
line 1
line 2
line 4
line 5
"},
);
// left modifies a line, right deletes the same line.
@ -479,12 +493,13 @@ fn test_materialize_conflict_two_forward_diffs() {
fn test_parse_conflict_resolved() {
assert_eq!(
parse_conflict(
b"line 1
indoc! {b"
line 1
line 2
line 3
line 4
line 5
",
"},
2
),
None
@ -494,19 +509,19 @@ line 5
#[test]
fn test_parse_conflict_simple() {
insta::assert_debug_snapshot!(
parse_conflict(
b"line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
",
parse_conflict(indoc! {b"
line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
"},
2
),
@r###"
@ -535,23 +550,24 @@ line 5
fn test_parse_conflict_multi_way() {
insta::assert_debug_snapshot!(
parse_conflict(
b"line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
%%%%%%%
line 2
+forward
line 3
line 4
>>>>>>>
line 5
",
indoc! {b"
line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
%%%%%%%
line 2
+forward
line 3
line 4
>>>>>>>
line 5
"},
3
),
@r###"
@ -582,18 +598,19 @@ line 5
fn test_parse_conflict_different_wrong_arity() {
assert_eq!(
parse_conflict(
b"line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
",
indoc! {b"
line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
"},
3
),
None
@ -605,17 +622,18 @@ fn test_parse_conflict_malformed_marker() {
// The conflict marker is missing `%%%%%%%`
assert_eq!(
parse_conflict(
b"line 1
<<<<<<<
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
",
indoc! {b"
line 1
<<<<<<<
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
"},
2
),
None
@ -627,18 +645,19 @@ fn test_parse_conflict_malformed_diff() {
// The diff part is invalid (missing space before "line 4")
assert_eq!(
parse_conflict(
b"line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
",
indoc! {b"
line 1
<<<<<<<
%%%%%%%
line 2
-line 3
+left
line 4
+++++++
right
>>>>>>>
line 5
"},
2
),
None