If the path is too long to fit on the screen, this patch makes it so
we elide the first part of it. It goes a bit further and trims it down
to ~70% of the screen, giving some room for the stat. This seems
somewhat similar to what Git does.
`insta` ignores leading indentation (as long as it's consistent within
the snapshot), but when a test case fails and you let `cargo insta`
update it, it's going to use a specific indentation. There were a few
tests that didn't match that indentation, which could lead to
surprising diffs if the tests fail at some point.
This shows that there's too much padding because we pad based on
number of bytes.
I had to reduce the path names for the file names not to get too long
for my file system.
We can still crash on terminals that are less than 4 characters wide
(maybe it doesn't matter if we do because the user can't tell the
crash report from a diffstat in such a terminal?). This patch fixes
the crash.
We would run into a panic due to "attempt to subtract with overflow"
if the path was long. This patch fixes that and adds tests showing the
current behavior when there are long paths and/or large diffs.
Many (most?) callers of `Store::empty_tree_id()` really want a
`MergedTreeId`, so let's create a helper for that. It returns the
`Legacy` variant, which is what all current callers used. That should
be all we need since the two variants compare equal these days, and
since trees built based on the legacy variant can get promoted to the
new variant on write if the config is enabled.
When we start writing tree-level conflicts in an existing repo, we
don't want commits that change the format to be non-empty if they
don't change any content. This patch updates `MergeTreeId::eq()` to
consider two resolved trees equal even if only their `MergedTreeId`
variant is different (one is path-level and one is tree-level).
I think I've gone through all places we compare tree ids and checked
that it's safe to compare them this way. One consequence is that
rebasing a commit without changing the parents (typically
auto-rebasing after `jj describe`) will not lead to the tree id
getting upgraded, due to an optimization we have for that case. I
don't think that's serious enough to handle specially; we'll have to
support the old format for existing repos for a while regardless of a
few commits not getting upgraded right away.
The number of failing tests with the config option enabled drop from
108 to 11 with this patch.
We're finally ready to start writing trees using the new format where
we represent conflicts by having multiple trees in the commit instead
of having a single tree with multiple entries at a path. This patch
adds a config option for that. It's not ready to be used yet, so I
haven't updated the release notes or other documentation.
I added only a simple CLI test for testing what happens when the
config is enabled in an existing repo. 108 tests currently fail if we
flip the default.
With the idea that less severe placeholders (like description) could
(and should) explicitly "opt out".
(Both email and name placeholders will be red with this change.)
I think most tests want a `MergedTree`, so this makes `create_tree()`
return that. I kept the old function as `create_single_tree()`. That's
now only used in `test_merge_trees` and `test_merged_tree`.
I also consistently imported the functions now, something I've
considered doing for a long time.
I made it simply fail on explicit fetch/import, and ignored on implicit import.
Since the error mode is predictable and less likely to occur. I don't think it
makes sense to implement warning propagation just for this.
Closes#1690.
With the already existing `MergedTree::resolve()` and all the recent
refactorings into `Merge<T>`, it's now very easy to add support for
3-way merging of `MergedTree` instances.
