It makes the call sites clearer if we pass the `TestRepoBackend` enum
instead of the boolean `use_git` value. It's also more extensible (I
plan to add another backend for tests).
Almost everyone calls the project "jj", and there seeems to be
consensus that we should rename the crates. I originally wanted the
crates to be called `jj` and `jj-lib`, but `jj` was already
taken. `jj-cli` is probably at least as good for it anyway.
Once we've published a 0.8.0 under the new names, we'll release 0.7.1
versions under the old names with pointers to the new crates names.
I'd like to be able to pass a `self` of `type `&ReadonlyRepo` to
functions that take a `&dyn Repo`. For that, we need `ReadonlyRepo`
itself to implement `Repo` instead of having `Arc<ReadonlyRepo>`
implement it. I could have solved it in a different way, but the `Arc`
requirement seems like an unnecessary constraint.
`SimpleOpHeadsStore` currently stores its files in
`.jj/repo/op_heads/simple_op_heads/`. The `.jj/repo/op_heads/type`
file indicates the type of op-heads backend. If that contains
"simple_op_head_store", we use the `SimpleOpHeadsStore`
backend. There's no need for the `simple_op_heads` directory to also
indicate the type of backend in its name. I kept just the `heads` in
the name to make it less redundant with the parent directory (which is
`op_heads)`. We could alternatively call the directory `values` or
similar.
We already have `create_random_commit()`, which returns a
`CommitBuilder`. Most callers directly write that to a
`MutableRepo`. That currently returns a `Commit`, but I'm about to
make it propagate errors from the backend. That would add an
`unwrap()` to this sequence, making it longer. Let's create a simple
helper for these callers to simplify this common pattern.
When you're done with the `CommitBuilder`, you're going to have to
call `write_to_repo()`, passing it a mutable `MutableRepo`
reference. It's a bit simpler to pass that reference when we create
the `CommitBuilder` instead, so that's what this patch does.
A drawback of passing in the mutable reference when we create the
builder is that we can't have multiple unfinished `CommitBuilder`
instance live at the same time. We don't have any such use cases yet,
and it's not hard to work around them, so I think this change is worth
it.
The next commit will introduce a newtype for -m/--message argument which
can be converted Into<String>.
Since CommitBuilder is a thin wrapper, code bloat caused by generic parameters
wouldn't matter. I have another set of commits that makes all builder methods
accept Into/IntoIterator, which will remove some of .clone() calls from tests.
Let's acknowledge everyone's contributions by replacing "Google LLC"
in the copyright header by "The Jujutsu Authors". If I understand
correctly, it won't have any legal effect, but maybe it still helps
reduce concerns from contributors (though I haven't heard any
concerns).
Google employees can read about Google's policy at
go/releasing/contributions#copyright.
We currently get the hostname and username from the `whoami` crate. We
do that in lib crate, without giving the caller a way to override
them. That seems wrong since it might be used in a server and
performing operations on behalf of some other user. This commit makes
the hostname and username configurable, so the calling crate can pass
them in. If they have not been passed in, we still default to the
values from the `whoami` crate.
These calls often appear in expressions long enough that not having to
qualify it means that we can sometimes avoid wrapping a line. I
noticed because IntelliJ told me that `test_git.rs` had some
unnecessary qualificiations (the function was already imported there).
The `testutils` module should ideally not be part of the library
dependencies. Since they're used by the integration tests (and the CLI
tests), we need to move them to a separate crate to achieve that.
The `CommitBuilder::store` field is used only in
`CommitBuilder::write_to_repo()`, but we can easily get access to the
`Store` from the `repo` argument there, so let's remove the field.
We don't even have any settings that affect the repo, so there's no
point in passing the settings. I think this was a leftover from before
we separated out the "workspace" concept; now we no longer create a
working-copy commit when we initialize a repo (we do that when we
attach the workspace).
If we have recorded in `MutableRepo` that commits have been abandoned
or rewritten, we should always rebase descendants before committing
the transaction (otherwise there's no reason to record the
rewrites). That's not much of a risk in the CLI because we already
have that logic in a central place there (`finish_transaction()`), but
other users of the library crate could easily miss it. Perhaps we
should automatically do any necessary rebasing we commit the
transaction in the library crate instead, but for now let's just have
a check for that to catch such bugs.
Most tests need a repo but don't need a working copy. Let's have a
function for setting up a test repo. But first, let's free up the name
`init_repo()` by renaming it to `init_workspace()` (which is also more
accurate).
It's been a lot of work, but now we're finally able to remove the
`Evolution` state! `jj obslog` still works as before (it just walks
the predecessor pointers).
The removal of hidden heads was just there to help with the transition
away from evolution (#32). Now that we no longer depend on evolution
for removing old heads, we can remove the hack.
I recently made the CLI remove hidden heads when a transaction is
committed (38474a9). Let's move that to `Transaction::commit()`, so
the library crate becomes more similar to how the CLI behaves and more
similar to our evolution-less future (#32).
I've wanted the API to look like this for a while. It seems like a
good API to me. It means that the caller won't have to reload the repo
after committing. The cost seems relatively small. It involves copying
potentially a lot of data in memory (at least the View object), but it
shouldn't involve reading from disk or any other processing. To reduce
the amount of data to copy, it may be worth switching to persistent
data types. I've also wanted to do that for the copying we do when
start a transaction.
I couldn't measure any slowdown caused by this change.
This is yet another step towards making the `View` types
simpler. Perhaps we eventually won't need to wrap the types returned
from the `OpStore` at all.
It can be useful to write an operation to the `OpStore` without also
making it visible when you load the repo. I had planned to add that
functionality at least for hooks, so the hooks can be run commands
with `jj --at-op=<operation>` and decide whether to publish the
operation. However, the immediate goal is to let us rewrite
`op_heads_store::merge_op_heads()` to use the usual `Transaction`
API. That needs to be able to just write the operation without
publishing it, since the publishing step takes a long, which
`op_heads_store::merge_op_heads()` (its caller, actually) has already
taken.
I want to keep the index updated within the transaction. I tried doing
that by adding a `trait Index`, implemented by `ReadonlyIndex` and
`MutableIndex`. However, `ReadonlyRepo::index` is of type
`Mutex<Option<Arc<IndexFile>>>` (because it is lazily initialized),
and we cannot get a `&dyn Index` that lives long enough to be returned
from a `Repo::index()` from that. It seems the best solution is to
instead create an `Index` enum (instead of a trait), with one readonly
and one mutable variant. This commit starts the migration to that
design by replacing the `Repo` trait by an enum. I never intended for
there there to be more implementations of `Repo` than `ReadonlyRepo`
and `MutableRepo` anyway.
We want to be able to be able to do fast `.contains()` checks on the
result, so `Iterator` was a bad type. We probably should hide the
exact type (currently `HashSet` for both readonly and mutable views),
but we can do that later. I actually thought I'd want to use
`.contains()` for indiciting public-phase commits in the log output,
but of course want to also indicate ancestors as public. This still
seem like a step (mostly) in the right direction.
