I'll probably add infix logical operators later, but the surround() function
is still useful because we don't have to repeat the condition:
if(x || y, "<" ++ separate(" ", x, y) ++ ">")
surround("<", ">", separate(" ", x, y))
It can't be used if we want to add placeholder text, though:
if(x || y, "<" ++ separate(" ", x, y) ++ ">", "(none)")
Closes#2924
This initializes a git backed repo.
* It does the same thing as `jj init --git` except that it
has a --colocated flag to explicitly specify that we want
the .git repo to be side-by-side the .jj repo in the working
directory.
* `jj init --git` will keep the current behaviour and will not
be able to create colocated git backed repos.
* Update test snapshots.
this has two main advantages:
- it makes it clear that the shells are mutually exclusive
- it allows us to extend the command with shell-specific options in the future if necessary
as a happy accident, it also adds support for `elvish` and `powershell`.
for backwards compatibility, this also keeps the existing options as hidden flags.
i am not super happy with how the new help looks; the instructions for setting up the shell are
squished together and IMO a little harder to read. i'm open to suggestions.
previously, `jj diff` would show the full contents of binary files such as images.
after this change, it instead shows "(binary)". it still shows the filename and metadata so that
users can open the file in the viewer of their choce.
future work could involve showing binary files as Sixel or similar; finding a way to compare large
non-binary files without filling up the screen; or extending the data backends to avoid having to
read the whole file contents into memory.
Summary: Put both notices together at once, for ease of reading and
understanding.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: I2aedb42fdab346b21990a106433512d7ec119ad4
GitHub announced these new Apple Silicon based runners today. Let's take them
for a spin.
Let's also add an entry in the release matrix to build and publish `aarch64-
apple-darwin` binaries, too. This doesn't migrate the old release matrix entry;
it still uses a `macos-11` runner. This means the x86 binaries should work on a
few older macOS versions if users need it.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
With my jj repo, the number of jj/keep refs went down from 87887 to 27733.
The .git directory size is halved, but we'll need to clean up extra and index
files to save disk space. "git gc --prune=now && jj debug reindex" passed, so
the repo wouldn't be corrupted.
#12
This is a convenient command, for scripting things like `cd $(jj root)
&& do something`, and it seems better to allow people to find it
before they learn about workspaces.
It seems obvious in hindsight to have a virtual root operation just
like we have a virtual root commit. It removes the same kind of
problems by making sure there's always a common ancestor (or multiple)
between any two commits.
I think the reason I didn't add a root operation from the beginning
was that there used to be a mandatory working-copy commit in the view
(this was before support for multiple workspaces).
Perhaps we should remove the "initialize repo" operation now. The only
difference between their view objects is that the "initialize repo"
operation adds the root commit as a head. We could add that to the
root operation, but then the root operation's value depends on the
commit backend.
Since new operations and views may be added concurrently by another process,
there's a risk of data corruption. The keep_newer parameter is a mitigation
for this problem. It's set to preserve files modified within the last 2 weeks,
which is the default of "git gc". Still, a concurrent process may replace an
existing view which is about to be deleted by the gc process, and the view
file would be lost.
#12
In order to implement GC (#12), we'll need to somehow prune old operations.
Perhaps the easiest implementation is to just remove unwanted operation files
and put tombstone file instead (like git shallow.) However, the removed
operations might be referenced by another jj process running in parallel. Since
the parallel operation thinks all the historical head commits are reachable, the
removed operations would have to be resurrected (or fix up index data, etc.)
when the op heads get merged.
The idea behind this patch is to split the "op log" GC into two steps:
1. recreate operations to be retained and make the old history unreachable,
2. delete unreachable operations if the head was created e.g. 3 days ago.
The latter will be run by "jj util gc". I don't think GC can be implemented
100% safe against lock-less append-only storage, and we'll probably need some
timestamp-based mechanism to not remove objects that might be referenced by
uncommitted operation.
FWIW, another nice thing about this implementation is that the index is
automatically invalidated as the op id changes. The bad thing is that the
"undo" description would contain an old op id. It seems the performance is
pretty okay.
This is basically the same as Mercurial's workaround. I don't know about Git,
but arguments order is very restricted in git, so -C path can be parsed prior
to alias expansion. In hg and jj, doing that would be messy and unreliable.
Closes#2414
As far as I can see in the chat, there's no objection to changing the default,
and git.auto-local-branch = false is generally preferred.
docs/branches.md isn't updated as it would otherwise conflict with #2625. I
think the "Remotes" section will need a non-trivial rewrite.
#1136, #1862
This is really a simple change that does the following in a transaction:
* Set the new branch name to point to the same commit as the old branch name.
* Set the old branch name to point to no commit (hence deleting the old name).
Before it starts, it confirms that the new branch name is not already in use.
When e.g. `jj rebase` results in new conflicts, it's useful for the
user to learn about that without having to run `jj log` right
after. This patch adds reporting of new conflicts created by an
operation. It also add reporting of conflicts that were resolved or
abandoned by the operation.
There was no measurable performance impact when rebasing a single
commit in the Linux kernel repo.
This adds an initial `jj util gc` command, which simply calls `git gc`
when using the Git backend. That should already be useful in
non-colocated repos because it's not obvious how to GC (repack) such
repos. In my own jj repo, it shrunk `.jj/repo/store/` from 2.4 GiB to
780 MiB, and `jj log --ignore-working-copy` was sped up from 157 ms to
86 ms.
I haven't added any tests because the functionality depends on having
`git` binary on the PATH, which we don't yet depend on anywhere
else. I think we'll still be able to test much of the future parts of
garbage collection without a `git` binary because the interesting
parts are about manipulating the Git repo before calling `git gc` on
it.
I think this is a variant of the problem fixed by 7fda80fc22 "tree: simplify
conflict before resolving at hunk level." We need to simplify() the conflict
before and after extracting file ids because the source conflict values may
contain trees to be cancelled out, and the file values may differ only in exec
bits. Since the legacy tree passes a simplified conflict in to this function,
I made the merged tree do the same.
Fixes#2654
Allowing `jj init --git` in an existing Git repo creates a second Git
store in `.jj/repo/store/git`, totally disconnected from the existing
Git store. This will only produce extremely confusing bugs for users,
since any operations they make in Git will *not* be reflected in the
jj repo.
Per discussion in https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/discussions/2555. I'm
okay with either way, but it's confusing if we had "branch create" and
"branch set" and both of these could create a new branch.
As discussed in Discord, it's less useful if remote_branches() included
Git-tracking branches. Users wouldn't consider the backing Git repo as
a remote.
We could allow explicit 'remote_branches(remote=exact:"git")' query by changing
the default remote pattern to something like 'remote=~exact:"git"'. I don't
know which will be better overall, but we don't have support for negative
patterns anyway.
Summary: A natural extension of the existing support, as suggested by Scott
Olson. Closes#2496.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: I91c9c8c377ad67ccde7945ed41af6c79
Like "jj log PATHS...", unmatched name isn't an error. I don't think
"jj branch list glob:'push-*'" should fail just because there are no in-flight
PR branches.
Since "jj git fetch --branch" supports glob patterns, users would expect that
"jj git push --branch glob:.." also works.
The error handling bits are copied from "branch" sub commands. We might want to
extract it to a common helper function, but I haven't figured out a reasonable
boundary point yet.
