Sometimes a tagged commit is not in any branch on the remote, but we
should still consider them upstream and not include them in the
default log template.
This was reported by @colemickens but now that I think about it, I
remember seeing such commits in the Git core repo (v1.4.4.5 and a few
commits before it were never merged into main).
We don't have a good way of testing this because we don't have a
command for creating tags.
Closes#681
This was actually what I meant in my code-review comment but I used
the wrong word ("clip") :) I wasn't going to bother changing it, but
Clippy nightly just started warning about it.
The function has only one caller since 25b922cd0b and it's pretty
small. Inlining also means we can reuse the joined paths created in
it, so I did that by extracting variables for them.
Since 'merges()' just filters the candidates set per item, it doesn't need
a candidates argument. Perhaps, 'merges(x)' could be a predicate to select
merge commits within a subgraph 'x', but I don't know if that would be
useful.
Since 'filter(expr)' is identical to 'expr & filter()', it can be rewritten
in order to minimize the candidates set to be scanned.
The implementation is somewhat similar to revsetlang.optimize() of Mercurial,
but I've split the tree rewriting logic to several steps. I think that's good
for maintainability and should help us conclude that a recursion will
eventually terminate.
This helps to match '(filter, _) | (_, filter)' to rewrite the expression
tree. Only one predicate is allowed for now, but I think it can be extended
to internalize 'f(c) & g(c)' as '(g*f)(c)' to eliminate redundant lookup
of commit object.
Our readme says that pull request require too many manual steps. I
think that refers to the manual abandoning of merged commits that was
necessary before 57ba9a940976; I think the workflow works reasonably
well these days. So let's avoid scaring away potential new users by
mentioning that old problem.
I had `init.defaultBranch = main` in my global config (just being
rolled out internally at Google, it seems), which made
`test_import_refs_reimport_head_removed()` and
`test_fetch_initial_commit()` fail. This fixes it.
Since d56ae79d3f, `WorkingCopy` no longer reads `.gitignores`
directly from `$HOME/.gitignore`, so we don't need the workaround to
prevent it in the tests.
More workspace-derived parameters will be added, and I don't think wrapping
with Option for each makes sense because all parameters should be available
if workspace exists.
Unlike matcher_from_values(), this function is trivial and isn't widely
used. Let's simply do .map() and .collect().
TODO comment is relocated to matcher_from_values(). I think glob and
fileset-like stuff will be added to the matcher parser, not to the
'Path -> RepoPath' function. And it's probably implemented in lib crate.
It seems a bit invasive that RepoPath constructor processes an environment
like cwd, but we need an unmodified input string to build a readable error.
The error could be rewrapped at cli boundary, but I don't think it would
worth inserting indirection just for that.
I made s/file_path/fs_path/ change because there's already to_fs_path()
function, and "file path" in RepoPath context may be ambiguous.
The demos don't need to be animated - the user wouldn't miss anything
if they skipped to the end. So let's just show the full output so the
user can read through it at their own pace. We could use plain text,
but I think the colors are helpful, so I went with screenshots.
Closes#166.
This patch addresses TODOs described in parse_file_path_wc_in_cwd() test.
Since the input string is considered a filesystem path, I think it makes
sense to normalize the cwd + input path first.
These utility functions will probably be moved to lib to implement file()
revset resolution.
