"Bookmark changes" sounds like changes will be bookmarked, and "Bookmark" here
is redundant. If we add support for pushing tags, this message will have to be
generalized anyway.
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
The user can define the setting `git.private-commits` as they desire. For
example:
git.private-commits = 'description(glob:"wip:*")'
If any commits are in this revset, then the push is aborted.
If a commit would be private but already exists on the remote, then it does
not block pushes, nor do its descendents block pushes unless they are also
contained in `git.private-commits`.
Closes#3376
