This adds an initial `jj util gc` command, which simply calls `git gc`
when using the Git backend. That should already be useful in
non-colocated repos because it's not obvious how to GC (repack) such
repos. In my own jj repo, it shrunk `.jj/repo/store/` from 2.4 GiB to
780 MiB, and `jj log --ignore-working-copy` was sped up from 157 ms to
86 ms.
I haven't added any tests because the functionality depends on having
`git` binary on the PATH, which we don't yet depend on anywhere
else. I think we'll still be able to test much of the future parts of
garbage collection without a `git` binary because the interesting
parts are about manipulating the Git repo before calling `git gc` on
it.
I think this is a variant of the problem fixed by 7fda80fc22 "tree: simplify
conflict before resolving at hunk level." We need to simplify() the conflict
before and after extracting file ids because the source conflict values may
contain trees to be cancelled out, and the file values may differ only in exec
bits. Since the legacy tree passes a simplified conflict in to this function,
I made the merged tree do the same.
Fixes#2654
Otherwise an empty subtree would be added to the parent tree.
If the stored tree contained an empty subtree, simplify() wouldn't work
against new "absent" subtree representation. I don't know if there's a
such code path, but I believe it's very rare to encounter the problem.
#2654
See comments inline for details. Cc #2600.
In particular, I wanted to make sure these behaviors are not affected by #2646.
They don't seem to be.
The tests ended up weirder than expected because of
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/issues/2600#issuecomment-1835418824. Even
though, right now, the behavior of tests is unaffected by that issue, the
*expected* behavior is different.
Branches move around a little confusigly with `abandon`. We do want to keep
them, to test their behavior, but we can show the change id to make things
clearer.
Each instance of the enum represents a single command, so singular
`*Command` seems better. That also seems to match the examples in
clap's documentation.
This basically backs out the change 1b9a3e27e0 "merged_tree: read before/after
trees concurrently." As we decided to add a separate impl for async access, it
doesn't make sense to read before/after pair in parallel.
The async single_tree() is moved to TreeDiffStreamImpl. It will help remove
the sync version when the performance problem is solved.
In snapshot(), changed_file_states are received in arbitrary order. For the
other callers, entries are in diff_stream order, so we don't have to sort
them.
With watchman enabled, we can see the cost of sorting the sorted proto entries.
I don't think this is significant, but we can mitigate it by adding
is_file_states_sorted flag to the proto message if needed:
```
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 20 -L bin jj-0,jj-1 \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux files ~/mirrors/linux/no-match"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux files ~/mirrors/linux/no-match
Time (mean ± σ): 164.8 ms ± 16.6 ms [User: 50.2 ms, System: 111.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 148.1 ms … 195.0 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux files ~/mirrors/linux/no-match
Time (mean ± σ): 171.8 ms ± 13.6 ms [User: 61.7 ms, System: 109.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 159.5 ms … 192.1 ms 20 runs
```
Without watchman:
```
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 20 -L bin jj-0,jj-1 \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux files ~/mirrors/linux/no-match"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux files ~/mirrors/linux/no-match
Time (mean ± σ): 367.3 ms ± 30.3 ms [User: 1415.2 ms, System: 633.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 325.4 ms … 421.7 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux files ~/mirrors/linux/no-match
Time (mean ± σ): 327.7 ms ± 24.9 ms [User: 1059.1 ms, System: 654.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 296.0 ms … 385.4 ms 20 runs
```
I haven't measured snapshotting against dirty working copy, but I don't think
it would be slower than the original implementation.
I'll replace the current lazy loading mechanism with this. Read-only methods
are implemented on the borrowed type so that we can narrow lookup scope
recursively.
Note that one of the new tests panics; this is a newly discovered bug.
In Git, a commit's direct parent is allowed to also be an indirect ancestor
at the same time. `jj` currently tries to prevent this situation, but does
allow it. The correctness of `rebase -r A -d descendant_of_A` currently depends
on this jj-specific behavior; we should change that.
Cc #2600
self.contains(other) means that the self tree contains the other tree (i.e.
the self path is prefix of the other), but it could be confused the other way
around if we were thinking about the path literal, not the tree. Let's add
.starts_with() instead by copying the std::path::Path definition.
Allowing `jj init --git` in an existing Git repo creates a second Git
store in `.jj/repo/store/git`, totally disconnected from the existing
Git store. This will only produce extremely confusing bugs for users,
since any operations they make in Git will *not* be reflected in the
jj repo.
This enables cheap str-to-RepoPath cast, which is useful when sorting and
filtering a large Vec<(String, _)> list by using matcher for example. It
will also eliminate temporary allocation by repo_path.parent().
I'm going to add borrowed RepoPath type, and most from_internal_string()
callers will be migrated to it. For the remaining callers, it makes more
sense to move the ownership of String to RepoPathBuf.
This follows up on 3967f63 (see that commit's description for more
motivation) and e79c8b6.
In a discussion linked below, it was decided that forbidding `-r --skip-empty`
entirely is preferable to the mixed behavior introduced in 3967f63.
3967f637dc (commitcomment-133539911)
RepoPath::from_components() is removed since it is no longer a primitive
function.
The components iterator could be implemented on top of str::split(), but
it's not as we'll probably want to add components.as_path() -> &RepoPath.
Tree walking and tree_states map construction get slightly faster thanks to
fewer allocations and/or better cache locality. If we add a borrowed RepoPath
type, we can also implement a cheap &str to &RepoPath conversion on top. Then,
we can get rid of BTreeMap<RepoPath, FileState> construction at all.
Snapshot without watchman:
```
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 10 -L bin jj-0,jj-1 \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux status"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
Time (mean ± σ): 950.1 ms ± 24.9 ms [User: 1642.4 ms, System: 681.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 913.8 ms … 990.9 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
Time (mean ± σ): 872.1 ms ± 14.5 ms [User: 1922.3 ms, System: 625.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 853.2 ms … 895.9 ms 10 runs
Relative speed comparison
1.09 ± 0.03 target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
1.00 target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux status
```
Tree walk:
```
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 10 -L bin jj-0,jj-1 \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux files --ignore-working-copy"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux files --ignore-working-copy
Time (mean ± σ): 375.3 ms ± 15.4 ms [User: 223.3 ms, System: 151.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 359.4 ms … 394.1 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux files --ignore-working-copy
Time (mean ± σ): 357.1 ms ± 16.2 ms [User: 214.7 ms, System: 142.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 341.6 ms … 378.9 ms 10 runs
Relative speed comparison
1.05 ± 0.06 target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux files --ignore-working-copy
1.00 target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux files --ignore-working-copy
```
The added test would fail if paths were purely ordered by concatenated strings.
I'm not sure if we want to preserve the current ordering, but let's not break
it for the moment.
This follows up on @matts1 's #2609.
We still allow the `-r` commit to become empty. I would be more comfortable if
there was a test for that, but I haven't done that (yet?) and it seems pretty
safe. If that's a problem, I'm happy to forbid `-r --skip-empty` entirely,
since it is far less useful than `-s --skip-empty` or `-b --skip-empty`.
I think it is undesired to abandon emptied descendants. As far as descendants
of `A` are concerned, `jj rebase -r A` should be equivalent to `jj abandon A`,
and `jj abandon` does not remove emptied commits. It also doesn't seem very
useful to do that, since I think descendant commits of an abandoned (or moved
with `-r`) commit only become empty in pathological cases.
Additionally, if we did want -r to empty descendants of `A`, we'd have to add
thorough tests and possibly improve the algorithm. I want to refactor `rebase
-r` and add features to it, and having to consider cases of commits becoming
abandoned makes everything harder.
For example, if we have
```
root -> A -> B -> C
```
and `jj rebase -r A -d C` empties commit `B` (or `C`), I do not know whether
the current algorithm will work correctly. It seems possible that it would, but
that depends on the fact that empty merge commits are not abandoned for
descendants. That seems dangerous to rely on without tests.
I hope (but can't promise) that in the near future, making DescendantRebaser
return more information should help make it possible to create such
functionality in a more robust way. I am likely to attempt this as part of
implementing `-r --after`.
