I broke the commands in a27da7d8d5 and thought I just fixed it in
c7cf914694a8. However, as I added a test, I realized that I made it
only reindex the commits since the previous operation. I meant for the
command to do a full reindexing of th repo. This fixes that.
Unlike Mercurial, this isn't a template keyword/function, but a config knob.
Exposing graph_width to templater wouldn't be easy, and I don't think it's
better to handle terminal wrapping in template.
I'm not sure if patch content should be wrapped, so this option only applies
to the template output for now.
Closes#1043
The parameter order follows indent()/label() functions, but this might be
a bad idea because fill() is more likely to have optional parameters. We can
instead add template.fill(width) method as well as .indent(prefix). If we take
this approach, we'll probably need to add string.fill()/indent() methods,
and/or implicit cast at method resolution. The good thing about the method
syntax is that we can add string.refill(), etc. for free, without inventing
generic labeled template functions.
For #1043, I think it's better to add a config like ui.log-word-wrap = true.
We could add term_width/graph_width keywords to the templater, but the
implementation would be more complicated, and is difficult to use for the
basic use case. Unlike Mercurial, our templater doesn't have a context map
to override the graph_width stub.
A list type isn't so useful without a map operation, but List<CommitId>
is at least printable. Maybe we can experiment with it to craft a map
operation.
If a map operation is introduced, this keyword might be replaced with
"parents.map(|commit| commit.commit_id)", where parents is of List<Commit>
type, and the .map() method will probably return List<Template>.
The argument order is different from Mercurial's indent() function. I think
indent(prefix, content) is more readable for lengthy content. However,
indent(content, prefix, ...) might be better if we want to add an optional
firstline_prefix argument.
This eliminates ambiguous parsing between "func()" and "expr ()".
I chose "++" as template concatenation operator in case we want to add
bit-wise negate operator. It's also easier to find/replace than "~".
Since there's no easy API to snapshot the stale working copy without releasing
the lock, we have to compare the tree ids after reacquiring the lock. We could
instead manually snapshot and rebase the working-copy commit, but that would
require more copy-paste codes.
Closes#1310
The outermost "op-log" label isn't moved to the default template. I think
it belongs to the command's formatter rather than the template.
Old bikeshedding items:
- "current_head", "is_head", or "is_head_op"
=> renamed to "current_operation"
- "templates.op-log" vs "templates.op_log" (the whole template is labeled
as "op-log")
=> renamed to "op_log"
- "template-aliases.'format_operation_duration(time_range)'"
=> renamed to 'format_time_range(time_range)'
We write conflict to the working copy by materializing them as
conflict markers in a file. When the file has been modified (or just
the mtime has changed), we parse the markers to reconstruct the
conflict. For example, let's say we see this conflict marker:
```
<<<<<<<
+++++++
b
%%%%%%%
-a
+c
>>>>>>>
```
Then we will create a hunk with ["a"] as removed and ["b", "c"] as
added.
Now, since commit b84be06c08, when we materialize conflicts, we
minimize the diff part of the marker (the `%%%%%%%` part). The problem
is that that minimization may result in a different order of the
positive conflict terms. That's particularly bad because we do the
minimization per hunk, so we can end up reconstructing an input that
never existed.
This commit fixes the bug by only considering the next add and the one
after that, and emitting either only the first with `%%%%%%%`, or both
of them, with the first one in `++++++++` and the second one in
`%%%%%%%`.
Note that the recent fix to add context to modify/delete conflicts
means that when we parse modified such conflicts, we'll always
consider them resolved, since the expected adds/removes we pass will
not match what's actually in the file. That doesn't seem so bad, and
it's not obvious what the fix should be, so I'll leave that for later.
When we materialize modify/delete conflicts, we currently don't
include any context lines. That's because modify/delete conflicts have
only two sides, so there's no common base to compare to. Hunks that
are unchanged on the "modify" side are therefore not considered
conflicting, and since they they don't contribute new changes, they're
simply skipped (here:
3dfedf5814/lib/src/files.rs (L228-L230)).
It seems more useful to instead pretend that the missing side is an
empty file. That way we'll get a conflict in the entire file.
We can still decide later to make e.g. `jj resolve` prompt the user on
modify/delete conflicts just like `hg resolve` does (or maybe it
actually happens earlier there, I don't remember).
Closes#1244.
Since type/name checking is made after alias substitution, we need to preserve
the original context to generate a readable error message.
We could instead attach a stack of (alias_id, span) to ExpressionNode, but
the extra AliasExpanded node helps to capture downstream error by a single
.map_err() call.
