This flag implements three modes:
- `copy`: copy sparse patterns from parent
- `full`: do not copy sparse patterns from parent
- `empty`: clear all paths, equal to `set --clear`
This is useful for various tooling like tools that want to run a parallel
process that queries the build system (without running into locks/blocking.)
I think continuing to copy sparse patterns makes sense as the default behavior.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
This enables workflows like "insert a commit that reformats the code in one of
my project directories".
`jj fix --include-unchanged-files` is an easy way to fix everything in the repo.
`jj fix --include-unchanged-files <file...>` fixes all of the `<files>` even if they are
unchanged.
This is mostly orthogonal to other features, so not many tests are added.
This is a significant and simple enough improvement that I think it's
appropriate to make it here instead of waiting for a `jj run`-based solution.
It seems everyone agrees that `obslog` is not an intuitive name. There
was some discussion about alternatives in #3592 and on #4146. The
alternatives included `evolution`, `evolutionlog`, `evolog`,
`rewritelog`, `revlog`, and `changelog`. It seemed like
`evolution-log`/`evolog` was the most popular option. That also
matches the command's current help text ("Show how a change has
evolved over time").
"Concurrent" operations are not necessarily actually concurrent, so
"divergent" seems like a better name. And "reconcile" seems like a
better term for merging them, though we also sometimes use "merge".
* We started with a tristate flag where:
- Auto - Maintain current behaviour. This edits if
the wc parent is not a head commit. Else, it will
create a new commit on the parent of the wc in
the direction of movement.
- Always - Always edit
- Never - Never edit, prefer the new+squash workflow.
However, consensus the review thread is that `auto` mode where we try to infer when to
switch to `edit mode`, should be removed. So `ui.movement.edit` is a boolean flag now.
- true: edit mode
- false: new+squash mode
* Also add a `--no-edit` flag as the explicit inverse of `--edit` and
ensure both flags take precedence over the config.
* Update tests that assumed edit mode inference, to specify `--edit` explicitly.
NOTE: #4302 was squashed into this commit, so see that closed PR for review history.
Part of #3947
This partially reverts 543036c753 "cli: run 'op log' without loading repo or
merging concurrent ops." User can now get around the issue by --at-op=@
--ignore-working-copy.
The idea is that --at-op specifies a certain operation, so --at-op=@ can be
interpreted as the option to select _the_ known head operation. This helps
eliminate special cases from "op log" which doesn't snapshot nor merge
concurrent ops.
The high level changes include:
- Reworking `fix_file_ids()` to loop over multiple candidate tools per file,
piping file content between them. Only the final file content is written to
the store, and content is no longer read for changed files that don't match
any of the configured patterns.
- New struct `ToolsConfig` to represent the parsed/validated configuration.
- New function `get_tools_config()` to create a `ToolsConfig` from a `Config`.
- New tests; the only old behavior that has changed is that we don't require
`fix.tool-command` if `fix.tools` defines one or more tools. The general
approach to validating the config is to fail early if anything is weird.
Co-Authored-By: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
We now have two `cmd_show` in the repo. I think this one should become
`cmd_file_show`, but this should be done uniformly over all the commands
for consistency.
I did *not* keep `print` as an alias (I couldn't find a compelling
reason to do it), but let me know if anyone feels like keeping it.
Since "set <thing>" often adds a <thing> if not exists, it make some sense
that "branch set" does upsert. The current "branch set" use case is now covered
by "branch move", so it's okay to change the "set" behavior.
If new branch is created by "branch set", status message and hint will be
printed to help migration. The user should be able to undo creation if it was
a mistake.
Closes#3584
This allows users to jump to the next conflict in the ancestors or children of
the start commit.
Continues work on #2126
Co-Authored-By: Noah Mayr <dev@noahmayr.com>
This basically supersedes the current "branch set" command. The plan is to turn
"branch set" into an "upsert" command, and deprecate "branch create". (#3584)
Maybe we can also add "branch set --new" flag to only allow creation of new
branches. One reason behind this proposed change is that "set" usually allows
both "creation" and "update". However, we also need a typo-safe version of
"set" to not create new branches by accident.
"jj branch move" is useful when advancing ancestor branches. Let's say you've
added a couple of commits on top of an existing PR branch, you can advance the
branch by "jj branch move --from 'heads(::@- & branches())' --to @-". If this
pattern is super common, maybe we can add --advance flag for short.
One drawback of this change is that "git branch --move" is equivalent to
"jj branch rename". I personally don't find this is confusing, but it's true
that "move" sometimes means "rename".
Otherwise they wouldn't be sorted in help. I also reordered the match statement.
Since subcommands are split to per-file modules, there's no point to keep some
logical ordering.
Most of the value of `jj fix` over a shell script is in formatting commits
other than `@`. `@::` often doesn't contain those other commits, so `-s @` is a
bad default.
We could get the same effect from `-s 'mutable() & ::@'`, but `reachable()` is
a bit more explicit and simple to read.
We could also base this on excluding `trunk()`, but that just seems like an
indirection for `mutable()` that might ignore the user's intent if they have
configured part of trunk to be mutable.
This commit adds an optional flag to be able to push commits with an
empty description to a remote git repo. While the default behavior is
ideal we might need to interact with a repo that has an empty commit
description in it. I ran into this issue a few weeks ago pushing commits
from an open source repo to an empty repo and had to go back to using
git for that push as I would not want to rewrite the history which was
many many years long just for that.
This flag allows users an escape hatch for pushing empty descriptions
for commits and they're sure that they want that behavior.
This commit adds the flag to the `git push` command and updates the docs
for the command. It also updates the original test to make sure that the
flag works as intended to reject the commit when not set and to allow
the commit when the flag is set.
Closes#2633
Previously, it sounded like `jj git` might only include highly-technical
commands, while IMO the most important commands in here are `jj git
fetch` and `jj git push`.
