- make an internal set of watchman extensions until the client api gets
updates with triggers
- add a config option to enable using triggers in watchman
Co-authored-by: Waleed Khan <me@waleedkhan.name>
Still alias function shadows builtin function (of any arity) by name. This
allows to detect argument error as such, but might be a bit inconvenient if
user wants to overload heads() for example. If needed, maybe we can add some
config/revset syntax to import builtin function to alias namespace.
The functions table is keyed by name, not by (name, arity) pair. That's mainly
because std collections require keys to be Borrow, and a pair of borrowed
values is incompatible with owned pair. Another reason is it makes easy to look
up overloads by name.
Alias overloading could also be achieved by adding default parameters, but that
will complicate the implementation a bit more, and can't prevent shadowing of
0-ary immutable_heads().
Closes#2966
Most of the value of `jj fix` over a shell script is in formatting commits
other than `@`. `@::` often doesn't contain those other commits, so `-s @` is a
bad default.
We could get the same effect from `-s 'mutable() & ::@'`, but `reachable()` is
a bit more explicit and simple to read.
We could also base this on excluding `trunk()`, but that just seems like an
indirection for `mutable()` that might ignore the user's intent if they have
configured part of trunk to be mutable.
It's been more than 6 months since we added support for dynamically
selecting the working copy implementation. This patch drops support
for selecting the default implementation of that and other stores.
This addresses issue #3317, where as discussed we want to show the paths to
configuration files if they contain errors, to make it easier for the user to
locate them.
The goal is to remove special case from parsing functions and provide slightly
better error message. I don't know if we'd want to use "all:" in aliases, but
there are no strong reasons to disable it.
This commit adds an optional flag to be able to push commits with an
empty description to a remote git repo. While the default behavior is
ideal we might need to interact with a repo that has an empty commit
description in it. I ran into this issue a few weeks ago pushing commits
from an open source repo to an empty repo and had to go back to using
git for that push as I would not want to rewrite the history which was
many many years long just for that.
This flag allows users an escape hatch for pushing empty descriptions
for commits and they're sure that they want that behavior.
This commit adds the flag to the `git push` command and updates the docs
for the command. It also updates the original test to make sure that the
flag works as intended to reject the commit when not set and to allow
the commit when the flag is set.
Closes#2633
Clear the rest of the cursor line (from the cursor to the end of the
row) after drawing the progress bar rather than clearing the entire line
before drawing. This reduces flickering on terminal emulators which are
able to redraw rapidly.
I recently needed to test something on top of a two branches at the
same time, so I created a new commit on top of both of them (i.e. a
merge commit). I then ran tests and made some adjustments to the
code. These adjustments belonged in one of the parent branches, so I
used `jj squash --into` to squash it in there. Unfortunately, that
meant that my working copy became a single-parent commit based on one
of the branches only. We already had #2859 for tracking this issue.
This patch changes the behavior so we create a new working-copy commit
with all of the previous parents.
As explained in the commit, our logic is a bit more complicated than
that of `git push --force-with-lease`. This is to match the behavior of
`jj git fetch` and branch conflict resolution rules.
I add them as aliases, since a user may instead choose to define `immutable_heads()`, for example, as `heads(immutable())`, and the define `immutable()` instead.
This revset correctly implements "reachability" from a set of source commits following both parent and child edges as far as they can go within a domain set. This type of 'bfs' query is currently impossible to express with existing revset functions.
previously, aliases to built-in commands were silently ignored. this matches git's behavior, but seems unhelpful, especially if the user doesn't know that a command with that name already exists.
give a warning rather than silently ignoring it.
When using `ui.color = "debug"`, changes in the output style
additionally include delimiters << and >>, as well as all active labels
at this point separated by ::. The output is otherwise unformatted and
the delimiters and labels inherit the style of the content they apply
to.
Perhaps, this can be used to generate parsable branches list.
The hint for deleted branches isn't migrated to the template. I'm thinking of
moving it out of the loop and printed once at the end. If we want to generate
a hint in template, we'll probably need local_ref.tracking_remote_refs(), etc.
that return a list of RefNames.
For example,
```
<<<<<<< Conflict 1 of 3
+++++++ Contents of side #1
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
%%%%%%% Changes from base to side #2
-line 3
+right 3.1
>>>>>>>
```
or
```
<<<<<<< Conflict 1 of 1
%%%%%%% Changes from base to side #1
-line 3
+right 3.1
+++++++ Contents of side #2
left 3.1
left 3.2
left 3.3
>>>>>>>
```
Currently, there is no way to disable these, this is TODO for a future
PR. Other TODOs for future PRs: make these labels configurable. After
that, we could support a `diff3/git`-like conflict format as well, in
principle.
Counting conflicts helps with knowing whether you fixed all the
conflicts while you are in the editor.
While labeling "side #1", etc, does not tell you the commit id or
description as requested in #1176, I still think it's an improvement.
Most importantly, I hope this will make `jj`'s conflict format less
scary-looking for new users.
I've used this for a bit, and I like it. Without the labels, I would see
that the two conflicts have a different order of conflict markers, but I
wouldn't be able to remember what that means. For longer diffs, it can
be tricky for me to quickly tell that it's a diff as opposed to one of
the sides. This also creates some hope of being able to navigate a
conflict with more than 2 sides.
Another not-so-secret goal for this is explained in
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/3109#issuecomment-2014140627. The
idea is a little weird, but I *think* it could be helpful, and I'd like
to experiment with it.
