This command checks not only whether Watchman works, but also whether
it's enabled in the config. Also, the output is easier to understand
than that of the other `jj debug watchman` commands.
It would be nice if `jj debug watchman` called `jj debug watchman
status`, but it's not trivial in `clap` to have a default subcommand.
This lets users use "large" revsets in commands such as `jj rebase`, without
needing the `all:` modifier.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: Ica80927324f3d634413d3cc79fbc73057ccefd8a
This can be used to flatten nested "if()"s. It's not exactly the same as "case"
or "switch" expression, but works reasonably well in template. It's not uncommon
to show placeholder text in place of an empty content, and a nullish value
(e.g. empty string, list, option) is usually rendered as an empty text.
As discussed in #2900, the milliseconds are rarely useful, and it can
be confusing with different timezones because it makes harder to
compare timestamps.
I added an environment variable to control the timestamp in a
cross-platform way. I didn't document because it exists only for tests
(like `JJ_RANDOMNESS_SEED`).
Closes#2900
Changes the formatter to accept not only existing color names (such as "red" or
"green") but also those in the form #rrggbb, where rr, gg, and bb are two-digit
hexadecimal numbers. This allows much finer control over colors used.
The `amend/unamend` aliases exist for smoothen onboarding for
Git/Mercurial users; I don't think we should recommend that users use
them, so I think it's fine if users override them as they
like. Therefore, I think they belong in the config.
There was a question on Discord about why using Difftastic wasn't working as the
diff tool. The root cause was putting `ui.diff.tool` in the wrong toml section,
when the `ui.` component actually refers to the `[ui]` section itself.
This reads kind of weirdly too because _immediately_ after this, the alternative
option of using the `merge-tools` section is suggested; except it uses `[merge-
tools.<name>]` which makes it immediately clear it's a section on its own.
This simply these two examples more consistent with each other, by using `[ui]`
instead of `ui.` to make it clear `ui.` is a top-level section.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
I enabled automerge for #2994, but forgot to actually *push* my changes
before resolving all the conversations, so GitHub insta-merged it.
This just addresses Ilya and Philip's final comments on #2994.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Someone on Discord asked this exact question, but these options apparently
weren't documented when they were added in the `0.7.0` release.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
As far as I can see in the chat, there's no objection to changing the default,
and git.auto-local-branch = false is generally preferred.
docs/branches.md isn't updated as it would otherwise conflict with #2625. I
think the "Remotes" section will need a non-trivial rewrite.
#1136, #1862
Thanks to @glencbz for noticing that VS Code works fine now as a
merge tool, and thanks to @solson for suggesting
`merge-tool-edits-conflict-markers = true`.
Although this is logically correct, the error message is a bit cryptic. It's
probably better to reject push if non-tracking remote branches exist.
#1136
This patch adds MutableRepo::track_remote_branch() as we'll probably need to
track the default branch on "jj git clone". untrack_remote_branch() is also
added for consistency.
This adds a new `revset-aliases.immutable_heads()s` config for
defining the set of immutable commits. The set is defined as the
configured revset, as well as its ancestors, and the root commit
commit (even if the configured set is empty).
This patch also adds enforcement of the config where we already had
checks preventing rewrite of the root commit. The working-copy commit
is implicitly assumed to be writable in most cases. Specifically, we
won't prevent amending the working copy even if the user includes it
in the config but we do prevent `jj edit @` in that case. That seems
good enough to me. Maybe we should emit a warning when the working
copy is in the set of immutable commits.
Maybe we should add support for something more like [Mercurial's
phases](https://wiki.mercurial-scm.org/Phases), which is propagated on
push and pull. There's already some affordance for that in the view
object's `public_heads` field. However, this is simpler, especially
since we can't propagate the phase to Git remotes, and seems like a
good start. Also, it lets you say that commits authored by other users
are immutable, for example.
For now, the functionality is in the CLI library. I'm not sure if we
want to move it into the library crate. I'm leaning towards letting
library users do whatever they want without being restricted by
immutable commits. I do think we should move the functionality into a
future `ui-lib` or `ui-util` crate. That crate would have most of the
functionality in the current `cli_util` module (but in a
non-CLI-specific form).
I think the feature is requested by enough users that we should
include it by default, also for people who install from source (we
include it in the `packaging` feature already).
It increases the size of the binary from 16.5 MiB to 17.8 MiB. I
suspect we'd see some of that increase in size soon anyway, as I'm
probably going to use Tokio for making async backend requests.
`vimtabdiff` has a few potential advantages:
- It can be much more convenient for diffs with few files
- It can be easier to set up for some people (it is a Python script rather
than a Vim plugin).
- The author accepts patches, and I hope to make it support 3-pane diff.
The pros and cons are also described in the linked Gist.
That is, jj will use ui.default_description as a starting point when
user is about to describe an empty change.
I think it might be confusing to do this with -m / --stdin (violates
WYSIWYG), so I'm only doing this when jj invokes an editor.
Also, this could evolve into a proper template in the future instead of
just plain text, to allow inheriting from parent change(s), for example.
Partially addresses #1354.
This could be a "ui.diff.format" variant, but we would need to solve namespace
problem by prefixing "tool:<name>" for example. Then, inlining command arguments
would become uglier.
#1886
