forked from mirrors/jj
af986a58ed
While explaining branch tracking behavior, I find it's bad UX that a deleted branch can be re-"create"d with tracking state preserved. It's rather a "set" operation. Since deleted tracking branch is still listed, I think it's better to assume that the local branch name is reserved. https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/discussions/3871 Renaming to deleted tracking branch is still allowed (with warning) because the "rename" command can't handle tracked remotes very well. If it were banned, bad rename couldn't be reverted by using "jj branch rename". It would be confusing if "rename a b" succeeded with warning, but the following "rename b a" failed. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| examples | ||
| src | ||
| testing | ||
| tests | ||
| build.rs | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| LICENSE | ||