Yuya Nishihara e0c35684af merge: rename Merge::new() to Merge::from_removes_adds() ... Since (removes, adds) pair is no longer the canonical representation of Merge, the name Merge::new() seems too generic. Let's give more verbose name.		2023-11-07 17:10:12 +09:00
..
test_bad_locking.rs
test_commit_builder.rs
test_commit_concurrent.rs
test_conflicts.rs	merge: rename Merge::new() to Merge::from_removes_adds()	2023-11-07 17:10:12 +09:00
test_default_revset_graph_iterator.rs
test_diff_summary.rs
test_git.rs	git: add config to disable abandoning of unreachable commits	2023-11-05 06:10:54 -08:00
test_id_prefix.rs
test_index.rs
test_init.rs
test_load_repo.rs
test_local_working_copy.rs	merge: rename Merge::new() to Merge::from_removes_adds()	2023-11-07 17:10:12 +09:00
test_local_working_copy_concurrent.rs
test_local_working_copy_sparse.rs
test_merge_trees.rs	merge: have Merge::adds()/removes() return iterator	2023-11-05 16:43:06 +09:00
test_merged_tree.rs	merge: rename Merge::new() to Merge::from_removes_adds()	2023-11-07 17:10:12 +09:00
test_mut_repo.rs
test_operations.rs
test_refs.rs	merge: add Merge constructor that accepts interleaved values	2023-11-07 17:10:12 +09:00
test_revset.rs
test_rewrite.rs
test_view.rs
test_workspace.rs