I'll probably add infix logical operators later, but the surround() function
is still useful because we don't have to repeat the condition:
if(x || y, "<" ++ separate(" ", x, y) ++ ">")
surround("<", ">", separate(" ", x, y))
It can't be used if we want to add placeholder text, though:
if(x || y, "<" ++ separate(" ", x, y) ++ ">", "(none)")
Closes#2924
This reimplements the change 9faa4670d5 "cli: on init, import git refs prior
to importing HEAD." Initialization is special because the HEAD ref isn't
available to jj yet, and there is an empty working-copy commit.
The initialization function could be refactored to go through the common code
path, but I think doing that would make future improvement harder. We might
want to initialize tracking branches based on .git/config for example.
Fixes#2942
This initializes a git backed repo.
* It does the same thing as `jj init --git` except that it
has a --colocated flag to explicitly specify that we want
the .git repo to be side-by-side the .jj repo in the working
directory.
* `jj init --git` will keep the current behaviour and will not
be able to create colocated git backed repos.
* Update test snapshots.
A few minor updates after 0f27152 AKA #2945
Specifically, I tried to change the help text so that it looks better as
Markdown. I also reworded the deprecation warning and added a hint.
this has two main advantages:
- it makes it clear that the shells are mutually exclusive
- it allows us to extend the command with shell-specific options in the future if necessary
as a happy accident, it also adds support for `elvish` and `powershell`.
for backwards compatibility, this also keeps the existing options as hidden flags.
i am not super happy with how the new help looks; the instructions for setting up the shell are
squished together and IMO a little harder to read. i'm open to suggestions.
it's somewhat confusing to me that the `--bash` flag exists at all, since it does nothing - maybe it makes sense to give a hard error? or just remove the flag?
but in any case, it seems good to document the existing behavior.
previously, `jj diff` would show the full contents of binary files such as images.
after this change, it instead shows "(binary)". it still shows the filename and metadata so that
users can open the file in the viewer of their choce.
future work could involve showing binary files as Sixel or similar; finding a way to compare large
non-binary files without filling up the screen; or extending the data backends to avoid having to
read the whole file contents into memory.
Previously, `jj git push; jj git push` would tell the user that "No
branches point to the specified revisions.". I found this confusing,
even though strictly speaking it is correct (as the default revset only
considers revisions that haven't been pushed to the remote).
Closes#2241
The error output gets more verbose because all gix error sources are printed.
Maybe we'll need a better formatting, but changing to multi-line output doesn't
look nice either.
These error types are special because the message is embedded in ASCII art. I
think it would be a source of bugs if some error types had ": {source}" but
others don't. So I'm going to remove all ": {source}"s, and let the callers
concatenate them when needed.
This mostly reverts https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/2901 as well as its
fixup https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/2903. The related bug is reopened,
see https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/issues/2869#issuecomment-1920367932.
The problem is that while the fix did fix#2869 in most cases, it did
reintroduce the more severe bug https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/issues/2760
in one case, if the working copy is the commit being rebased.
For example, suppose you have the tree
```
root -> A -> B -> @ (empty) -> C
```
### Before this commit
#### Case 1
`jj rebase -s B -d root --skip-empty` would work perfectly before this
commit, resulting in
```
root -> A
\-------B -> C
\- @ (new, empty)
```
#### Case 2
Unfortunately, if you run `jj rebase -s @ -d A --skip-empty`, you'd have the
following result (before this commit), which shows the reintroduction of #2760:
```
root -> A @ -> C
\-- B
```
with the working copy at `A`. The reason for this is explained in
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/2901#issuecomment-1920043560.
### After this commit
After this commit, both case 1 and case 2 will be wrong in the sense of #2869,
but it will no longer exhibit the worse bug #2760 in the second case.
Case 1 would result in:
```
root -> A
\-------B -> @ (empty) -> C
```
Case 2 would result in:
```
root -> A -> @ -> C
\-- B
```
with the working copy remaining a descendant of A
Summary: Put both notices together at once, for ease of reading and
understanding.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: I2aedb42fdab346b21990a106433512d7ec119ad4
Summary: As discussed in Discord, on GitHub, and elsewhere, this change
deprecates the use of `jj merge` and suggests users use `jj new` exclusively
instead. `merge` isn't completely unfit as a name; but we think it obscures
the generality of `new` and we want people to use it instead.
To further drive the bit home, by default, `jj merge` is now hidden. This will
hopefully stop new users from running into it.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: I94938aca9d3e2aa12d1394a5fbc58acce3185b56
Summary: As discussed in Discord, on GitHub, and elsewhere, this change
deprecates the use of `jj checkout` and suggests users use `jj new` exclusively
instead. The verb `checkout` is a relic of a bygone era the — days of RCS
file locking, before 3-way merge — and is not a good, fitting name for the
functionality it provides.
To further drive the bit home, by default, `jj checkout` (and `jj co`) is now
hidden. This will hopefully stop new users from running into it.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: I7a1adfc9168fce1f25cf5d4c4c313304769e41a1
These didn't really need to use `jj checkout`, and it will be deprecated in a
future change anyway. Move them out of there and into `new`.
Ideally this would go into `test_conflicts.rs`, but that exists in `jj-lib`, so
it doesn't have `TestEnvironment` available to it.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
Change-Id: If0173b27ab4d1f6036a4ec632ec77b6824f310c3
* Move git_init() to cli/src/commands/git.rs and call it from there.
* Move print_trackable_remote_branches into cli_util since it's not git specific,
but would apply to any backend that supports remote branches.
* A no-op change. A follow up PR will make use of this.
* Create a git_init() function in cli/src/commands/init.rs where all git related work is done.
This function will be moved to cli/src/commands/git.rs in a subsequent PR.
I'm going to rewrite the error output to print source chain one by one.
The "{message}: {err}" pattern is wrapped in an error struct. InternalError
variant could be a { message, source } pair, but not all errors need an
additional message. This will also apply to UserError.
