The original idea was similar to Mercurial's "topo" sorting, but it was bad
at handling merge-heavy history. In order to render merges of topic branches
nicely, we need to prioritize branches at merge point, not at fork point.
OTOH, we do also want to place unmerged branches as close to the fork point
as possible. This commit implements the former requirement, and the latter
will be addressed by the next commit.
I think this is similar to Git's sorting logic described in the following blog
post. In our case, the in-degree walk can be dumb since topological order is
guaranteed by the index. We keep HashSet<CommitId> instead of an in-degree
integer value, which will be used in the next commit to resolve new heads as
late as possible.
https://github.blog/2022-08-30-gits-database-internals-ii-commit-history-queries/#topological-sorting
Compared to Sapling's beautify_graph(), this is lazy, and can roughly preserve
the index (or chronological) order. I tried beautify_graph() with prioritizing
the @ commit, but the result seemed too aggressively reordered. Perhaps, for
more complex history, beautify_graph() would produce a better result. For my
wip branches (~30 branches, a couple of commits per branch), this works pretty
well.
#242
Copied from MergedTree::has_conflict(). I feel it's slightly better since
RefTarget "is" always a Conflict-based type. It could be inverted to
RefTarget::is_resolved(), but refs are usually resolved, and all callers
have special case for !is_resolved() state.
We upgraded to clap 4.1 in 8f1dc490 (cargo: upgrade to clap 4.1,
2023-03-17), and the pipe to `sed` was removed in the README.md file in
that same commit. However the documentation was not updated in mod.rs,
which leads us to give the obsolete (now incorrect) advice when we run
`jj util completion --help`.
See #1393.
`MergedTree` is now ready to be used when checking if a commit has
conflicts, and when listing conflicts. We don't yet a way for the user
to say they want to use tree-level conflicts even for these
cases. However, since the backend can decide, we should be able to
have our backend return tree-level conflicts. All writes will still
use path-level conflicts, so the experimentation we can do at Google
is limited.
Beacause `MergedTree` doesn't yet have a way of walking conflicts
while restricting it by a matcher, this will make `jj resolve` a
little slower. I suspect no one will notice.
Alternatively, we can wrap BTreeMap<String, Option<RefTarget>> to flatten
Option<&Option<..>> internally, but doing that would be tedious. It would
also be unclear if map.remove(name) should construct an absent RefTarget if
the ref doesn't exist.
Since RefTarget will be reimplemented on top of Conflict<Option<CommitId>>,
we won't be able to simply return a slice of type &[CommitId]. These functions
are also renamed in order to disambiguate from Conflict::adds()/removes().
If RefTarget is migrated to new Conflict type, this function will create
RefTarget(Conflict::resolved(Some(id))).
We still need some .unwrap() to insert Option<RefTarget> into map, but maps
will be changed to store new RefTarget type, and their mutation API will
guarantee that Conflict::resolved(None) is eliminated.
This is (almost) a result of running
cargo +nightly clippy --workspace --all-targets --fix \
-- -A 'clippy::needless_raw_string_hashes'
with yesterday's nightly clippy.
https://github.com/mitsuhiko/insta/issues/389 causes numerous additional
`needless_raw_string_hashes` warnings, but it will hopefully be fixed soon.
For now, I recommend appending the second line to your invocations.
Almost everyone calls the project "jj", and there seeems to be
consensus that we should rename the crates. I originally wanted the
crates to be called `jj` and `jj-lib`, but `jj` was already
taken. `jj-cli` is probably at least as good for it anyway.
Once we've published a 0.8.0 under the new names, we'll release 0.7.1
versions under the old names with pointers to the new crates names.
Typical query would be something like -r 'mine()' or -r 'branches()' to
exclude remote-only branches #1136.
The query matches against local targets only. This means there's no way to
select deleted/forgotten branches by -r option. If we add a default revset
configuration, we'll need some way to turn the default off.
