When initializing a jj repo in the same directory as its backing git
repo, add `.jj/` to `.git/info/exclude` so it doesn't show up to `git`
commands.
This is part of #44.
If the workspace's working copy is shared with the backing Git repo,
we now automatically update the checkout in jj to match Git's HEAD
when that has changed.
With this change, I think users should be able to run `jj init
--git-store=.` and then continue to use `git` commands and
non-mutating `jj` commands without issue.
This is part of issue #44.
This change makes commands automatically import git refs if they're
run in a workspace that shares its working copy with the underlying
git repo. The import is done in a separate transaction.
This is part of #44.
It's useful to know which commit is checked out in the underlying Git
repo (if there is one), so let's show that. This patch indicates that
commit with `HEAD@git` in the log output. It's probably not very
useful when the Git repo is "internal" (i.e. stored inside `.jj/`),
because then it's unlikely to change often. I therefore considered not
showing it when the Git repo is internal. However, it turned out that
`HEAD` points to a non-existent branch in the repo I use, so it won't
get imported anyway (by the function added in the previous patch). We
can always review this decision later.
This is part of #44.
If nothing changed in a transaction, it's rarely useful to commit it,
so let's avoid that. For example, if you run `jj git import` without
changing the anything in the Git repo, we now just print "Nothing
changed.".
Some time ago, I made commands not commit the working copy when run at
an old operation, but it seems that I forgot to make it not update the
working copy. If you run e.g. `jj --at-op=<some operation> rebase -d
<some commit>`, it doesn't make sense for that to update the working
copy.
`ReadonlyRepo::init_*()` currently calls `WorkingCopy::init()`. In
order to remove that dependency, this patch wraps the
`ReadonlyRepo::init_*()` functions in new `Workspace` functions. A
later patch will have those functions call `WorkspaceCopy::init()`.`
The `Repo` doesn't do anything with the `WorkingCopy` except keeping a
reference to it for its users to use. In fact, the entire lib crate
doesn't do antyhing with the `WorkingCopy`. It therefore seems simpler
to have the users of the crate manage the `WorkingCopy` instance. This
patch does that by letting `Workspace` own it. By not keeping an
instance in `Repo`, which is `Sync`, we can also drop the
`Arc<Mutex<>>` wrapping.
I left `Repo::working_copy()` for convenience for now, but now it
creates a new instance every time. It's only used in tests.
This further decoupling should help us add support for multiple
working copies (#13).
Having a concept of a "workspace" will be useful for adding support
for multiple workspaces (#13). You can think of the "workspace" as a
repo combined with a working copy. A workspace corresponds 1:1 with a
`.jj/` directory. It's pretty close to what other VCS simply call a
"repo", but I've ended up using the word "repo" for what Git calls a
"bare repo".
I was confused myself why the message was only printed by `jj co` and
not e.g. `jj undo`. That probably means that it should always be
printed (or never be printed).
Especially when working on a new-to-you project, it's common to end up
with unwanted files automatically tracked before you realize that you
should have added them to the `.gitignore`. Even after adding them to
the `.gitignore`, it's not trivial to make them no longer tracked (you
need to move them away, run e.g. `jj st`, then move them back). This
patch adds `jj untrack` to simplify that (without actually moving the
files).
Closes#14.
The diff-editing code shares the `TreeState` functionality with the
working-copy code. That means we can now let the user edit conflicts
without materializing them first. So now the user can do e.g. `jj edit
-r <some commit>` and resolve only some of the conflicts.
As @arxanas noted, it's hard to tell which commit is currently checked
out. Hopefully bright colors will help. Maybe setting a background
color would be even clearer, but that's harder to do because the
formatter doesn't support background colors yet.
The CLI code for cloning a Git repo didn't use the usual
`finish_transaction()` method, because we didn't have support for
doing that on a repo that was creating half-way through a
command. That led to a bug where it would leave the initial checkout
(the one on top of the root commit) after checking out the correct
head.
`args` seems to make it clear that these are command-line arguments
(this is not Python, so there's no `*args`). It also avoids the risk
of conflicts and confusion with other matches (e.g. file patterns or
regexes).
