If the source commit becomes empty as a result of
`move/squash/unsquash`, we abandon it. However, perhaps we shouldn't
do that if the source commit is a working-copy commit because
working-copy commits are often work-in-progress commits.
The background for this change is that @arxanas had just started a new
change and had set a description on it, and then decided to make some
changes in the working copy that should be in the parent
commit. Running `jj squash` then abandoned the working-copy commit,
resuling in the description getting lost.
We had tests for `jj move` and `jj squash`, but not for `jj
unsquash`. I'm about to add a `--keep` option, so let's add tests for
the current behavior first.
The regular `Display` format is (not surprisingly) more user-friendly,
as pointed out by @yuja.
I also switched to using format strings for these cases, and some
nearby strings for consistency.
We can easily make the `DirEntry` available here, so we can call
`.metadata()` on that instead of on the `Path`. I think that avoids
walking the path. I'm sure this has no significant impact on
performance, but it's also almost as readable.
When we have just written a file to disk on checkout, let's record the
size we expected instead of what we got from `fstat()`. This should
address a race where the file was modified between the time we wrote
it and the time we requested its stat. I just happened to notice this
while going through the code; it seems very unlikely to be noticed in
practice.
When we have just written a file or conflict, we can get metadata for
it via the open file descriptor instead of using the path. That
removes the risk of a race where the file got removed or replaced by
another file type (at least on Unix).
These assertions were there to catch bugs, but when the bugs happen,
the assertions can obsure the underlying error (as @tp-woven found out
on #258). Let's just print errors instead.
We don't even have any settings that affect the repo, so there's no
point in passing the settings. I think this was a leftover from before
we separated out the "workspace" concept; now we no longer create a
working-copy commit when we initialize a repo (we do that when we
attach the workspace).
Before this change, `jj new` would check out the new commit only if it
was created on top of the current commit. I never liked that
special-casing, and after thinking more about how the open/closed
should work (see discussion #321), I think we want `jj new` to behave
similar to how `git/hg checkout` works, so it can effectively replace
the current `jj checkout` command for the use case of starting new
work on top of an existing commit.
The help text said you can `jj abandon; jj co @-` to go to the parent
commit (it it's an open commit), but `jj abandon` already takes you to
the parent.
We don't need the `config` crate's support for JSON etc., so let's
just enable the TOML feature. (Trying to import all the JSON, RON,
dependencies etc. into Google's source control was a pain.)
Mercurial has these aliases, so it will be familiar for Mercurial
users. My only hesitation about adding these aliases is that we might
want the these names for something else in the future. You could
imagine `up` and `down` commands, for example. We still have a long
time before 1.0, so we have plenty of opportunity to make breaking
changes if we think of some other use for the names :)
It can be confusing that some commits (typically the working copy)
don't have a description. Let's show a placeholder text in such cases.
I chose the format to match the "(no email configured)" message we
already have.
This should help make e.g. `squash` discoverable for users who search
the help output for "amend". It should also help users discover the
builtin abbreviations like `st` (for `status`).
This adds a `--reversed` flag to `jj log` to show commits with later
commits further down. It works both with and without the graph.
Since the graph-drawing code is already independent of the
relationship between commits, it doesn't need any updating.
The request to show the log output with more recent commits at the
bottom comes up once in a while (among Mercurial users, and now also
for jj from @arxanas). It's pretty easy to implement by adding an
adapter to the current `RevsetGraphIterator`. It works by first
collecting all nodes and edges into a vector and then yielding them in
reverse order and with reversed edges. That means it's no longer lazy,
but that seems fine since the feature is optional. Also, it's only the
subset of nodes that are in the selected revset that will be
collected.
Making the CLI use the new iterator adapter will come in a later
patch.
The default log output of showing all commits is not very useful when
contributing to an existing repo. Let's have it default to showing
commits not on any remote branch instead. I think that's the best we
can do since we don't have a configurable main branch yet, and we
don't even have per-repo configuration..
Closes#250.
