This is a no-op in terms of function, but provides a nicer way to derive the
ContentHash trait for structs using the `#[derive(ContentHash)]` syntax used
for other traits such as `Debug`.
This commit only adds the macro. A subsequent commit will replace uses of
`content_hash!{}` with `#[derive(ContentHash)]`.
The new macro generates nice error messages, just like the old macro:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotImplemented: content_hash::ContentHash` is not satisfied
--> lib/src/content_hash.rs:265:16
|
265 | z: NotImplemented,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `content_hash::ContentHash` is not implemented for `NotImplemented`
|
= help: the following other types implement trait `content_hash::ContentHash`:
bool
i32
i64
u8
u32
u64
std::collections::HashMap<K, V>
BTreeMap<K, V>
and 38 others
```
This commit does two things to make proc macros re-exported by jj_lib useable
by deps:
1. jj_lib needs to be able refer to itself as `jj_lib` which it does
by adding an `extern crate self as jj_lib` declaration.
2. jj_lib::content_hash needs to re-export the `digest::Update` type so that
users of jj_lib can use the `#[derive(ContentHash)]` proc macro without
directly depending on the digest crate. This is done by re-exporting it
as `DigestUpdate`.
#3054
It should be useful at least in the presentation layer to know which
operations correspond to working-copy snapshots. They might be
rendered differently in the graph, for example. Or maybe an undo
command wants to warn if you just undid a snapshot operation. This
patch just introduces a field in the metadata to store the
information.
I think I prefer this behavior because it's less lossy. The user can
manually simplify the history with `jj rebase -s <merge commit> -d
<one of the parents>` afterwards. We can roll this change back later
if we find it annoying.
We now have lots of tests of ancestor merges in `test_bug_2600()`, so
we don't need the ones in `test_basics()`. Since it doesn't have the
"nottherootcommit" commit, it would break when we change the default
to preserve ancestor merges.
I think the conclusion from #2600 is that at least auto-rebasing
should not simplify merge commits that merge a commit with its
ancestor. Let's start by adding an option for that in the library.
The shortest change id prefix will become a few digits longer, but I think
that's acceptable. Entries included in the "revsets.short-prefixes" set are
unaffected.
The reachable set is calculated eagerly, but this is still faster as we no
longer need to sort the reachable entries by change id. The lazy version will
save another ~100ms in mid-size repos.
"jj log" without working copy snapshot:
```
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 20 -L bin jj-0,jj-1,jj-2 \
-s "target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux debug reindex" \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux \
--ignore-working-copy log -r.. -l100 --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=\"\"'"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux --ignore-working-copy log -r.. -l100 --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
Time (mean ± σ): 353.6 ms ± 11.9 ms [User: 266.7 ms, System: 87.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 329.0 ms … 365.6 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux --ignore-working-copy log -r.. -l100 --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
Time (mean ± σ): 271.3 ms ± 9.9 ms [User: 183.8 ms, System: 87.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 250.5 ms … 282.7 ms 20 runs
Relative speed comparison
1.99 ± 0.16 target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux --ignore-working-copy log -r.. -l100 --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
1.53 ± 0.12 target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux --ignore-working-copy log -r.. -l100 --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
```
"jj status" with working copy snapshot (watchman enabled):
```
% hyperfine --sort command --warmup 3 --runs 20 -L bin jj-0,jj-1,jj-2 \
-s "target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux debug reindex" \
"target/release-with-debug/{bin} -R ~/mirrors/linux \
status --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=\"\"'"
Benchmark 1: target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux status --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
Time (mean ± σ): 396.6 ms ± 10.1 ms [User: 300.7 ms, System: 94.0 ms]
Range (min … max): 373.6 ms … 408.0 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux status --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
Time (mean ± σ): 318.6 ms ± 12.6 ms [User: 219.1 ms, System: 94.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 294.2 ms … 333.0 ms 20 runs
Relative speed comparison
1.85 ± 0.14 target/release-with-debug/jj-0 -R ~/mirrors/linux status --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
1.48 ± 0.12 target/release-with-debug/jj-1 -R ~/mirrors/linux status --config-toml='revsets.short-prefixes=""'
```
These methods are basically the same as the commit_id versions, but
resolve_change_id_prefix() is a bit more involved as we need to gather matches
from multiple segments.
In resolve_change_id_prefix(), I've implemented two different ways of
collecting the overflow items. I don't think they impact the performance,
but we can switch to the alternative method as needed.
This basically means that the change ids are interned. We'll implement binary
search over the sorted change ids table. The table could be sorted differently
for better cache locality, but it is in lexicographical order for simplicity.
With my testing, the cost of the id lookup isn't dominant.
Unlike the parent entries, the size of the per-id overflow items isn't saved.
That's s because the number of the same-change-id commits is either 1 or many.
It doesn't make sense to allocate 8 bytes for each change id. Instead, we'll
pay extra indirection cost to determine the size.
I'm going to add change id overflow table whose elements are of LocalPosition
type. Let's make sure that the serialization code would break if we changed
the underlying data type.
When adding a new workspace, I would expect that it inherits the
patterns from the workspace I ran the command in. We currently don't
do that. That's quite annoying when your repo has very many files
(like at Google).
`graphlog::Edge` is used somewhat inconsistently. I've replaced `Edge::Present`
with two distinct `Edge::Direct` and `Edge::Indirect` which simplifies the
construction of the enum.
Apparently, gix has 100ms timeout. Since this test tries to create contended
situation, it's possible that the ref lock can't be acquired. I've added
upper bound to the retry loop at b37293fa68 "tests: add upper bound to
test_concurrent_read_write_commit() loop", so ignoring arbitrary errors
should be okay.
The problem can be reproduced on my Linux machine by inserting 10ms sleep() to
gix and increasing the concurrency.
Fixes#3069
This is for completeness and to avoid accidents such as someone calling
`ContentHash::hash(1234u32.to_le_bytes())` and expecting it to hash properly as
a u32 instead of a 4 byte slice, which produces a different hash due to hashing
the length of the slice before its contents.
The `ContentHash` documentation specifies that implementations for enums should
hash the ordinal number of the variant contained in the enum as a 32-bit
little-endian number and then hash the contents of the variant, if any.
The current implementations for `std::Option`, `MergedTreeId`, and
`RemoteRefState` are non-conformant since they hash the ordinal number as a u8
with platform specific endianness.
Fixes#3051
Similar to the previous commit, these functions will be reused by the change id
lookup methods. The return value isn't cloned because resolve_id_prefix() will
return (key, value) pair, and the current caller doesn't need a cloned value.
This is recommended by the insta documentation.
See: https://docs.rs/insta/latest/insta/#optional-faster-runs.
Running on an M1 MacBook Pro
Before:
```
________________________________________________________
Executed in 31.10 secs fish external
usr time 118.87 secs 107.00 micros 118.87 secs
sys time 46.19 secs 847.00 micros 46.19 secs
```
After:
```
________________________________________________________
Executed in 29.73 secs fish external
usr time 119.58 secs 0.13 millis 119.58 secs
sys time 46.27 secs 1.74 millis 46.27 secs
```
This doesn't seem like a huge change, and there's noise in the measurements,
but I don't think it can hurt and insta recommends it.
This bundles all Jujutsu related media (the talk, its slides and the three articles we were featured in)
into a section.
Also update the news section to mention the recent deprecations and the three articles we recently
were featured in.
Thanks to everyone who wrote one.
