Even though we don't know the details yet, we know that we want to
make the index pluggable like the commit and opstore
backends. Defining a trait for it should be a good step. We can refine
the trait later.
The function is currently only about the length of commit IDs, so
let's clarify that. I'm going to add another function for the length
of change IDs next. I don't know if we're going to care about lengths
of other hashes in the future. We might even be able to remove the
current restriction that all commit IDs and all change IDs have the
same length.
This iterator will be used to merge neighbor commit ids across segments.
resolve_prefix() is simplified to non-short-circuiting loop. I think that's
fine because visiting parents is cheap, and the costly operation here is
segment_resolve_prefix().
entry_by_pos() could also be migrated to iterator, but I leave the unsafe
bits there.
ReadonlyIndex implementation leverages the existing binary search
function. MutableIndex one is basically the same as repo::IdIndex.
Shortest prefix length could be calculated for each segment, but I think
returning neighbors is better for testing.
If commit_id[..prefix_len] < prefix, commit_id < prefix is obviously true.
If commit_id[..prefix_len] == prefix, commit_id < prefix returns false. So
slicing isn't needed.
This makes commit_id_byte_prefix_to_pos() basically the same as
segment_commit_id_to_pos(), and these two functions can be merged.
matches() is called from resolve_change_id() loop right now, so it's better to
not allocate String there. Regarding new IdIndex integration, I'll probably make
IdIndex store raw byte ids instead of hexes, and use HexPrefix to look up
range and test prefixes. I think this is basically the same as prefix lookup
in MutableIndex, but I have no idea if we can factor out a common interface.
I made HexPrefix store (Vec<u8>, bool) instead of (Vec<u8>, Option<u8>) so
both min/partial prefixes can be borrowed as slice.
I ran an upgraded Clippy on the codebase. All the changes seem to be
about using variables directly in format strings instead of passing
them as separate arguments.
This will be a building block of 'parents(base)' revset. 'base---' will
be .filter_by_generation(3..4) for example. I think 'ancestors(base)' can
also have an optional generation parameter, but I haven't considered any
particular syntax yet.
Even though I couldn't determine if RevWalkGenerationRange has a measurable
cost compared to RevWalk, I'm not comfortable with enabling generation
tracking by default. So this patch adds a separate struct. I duplicated
Iterator::next() method as it seemed rather complicated to extract a common
iterator wrapper.
Actual filtering function and tests will be added by the next commit.
The idea behind this is to extend RevWalk to track generation (or depth from
the initial wanted items.) Basic DAG walk doesn't need such data, but a query
like 'rev---' could be translated to a RevWalk yielding nth ancestors.
The default log revset can also be expressed as 0/1-th ancestors of
'(remote_branches() | tags())..'.
Also, this appears to be faster than using boundary sets, based on the
bench extracted from test_index_commits_criss_cross().
Let's acknowledge everyone's contributions by replacing "Google LLC"
in the copyright header by "The Jujutsu Authors". If I understand
correctly, it won't have any legal effect, but maybe it still helps
reduce concerns from contributors (though I haven't heard any
concerns).
Google employees can read about Google's policy at
go/releasing/contributions#copyright.
The `testutils` module should ideally not be part of the library
dependencies. Since they're used by the integration tests (and the CLI
tests), we need to move them to a separate crate to achieve that.
I feel it doesn't make sense for a simple getter function to create an
owned vec after 0108673087 "backend: let each backend handle root commit
on write."
Originally, I had thought that these warnings would only potentially show up in nightly because there was a feature which exposed these functions, and we would be able to enable that feature and conditionally not define the conflicting methods. But it looks like these warnings also show up in stable. I've just suppressed each of them individually. Other options would be to rename them and just make them wrapper methods, or to disable `unstable_name_collisions` warnings at a higher scope (possibly including at the crate level).
