I've confused myself a few times already thinking that level 0 is the
root, so that's probably more intuitive. It also makes tests simpler
because the initial part of the list is unchanged when a new
transaction commits.
With this change, we start writing the incremental index to disk, so
the next reader won't have to re-read the commits and create the
index.
As of this change, we simply write a new index file for each
transaction. That will clearly mean that the stack of files gets deep
pretty quickly. For now, the user will have to do `jj debug reindex`
when things get slow. I plan to change it so instead of writing an
incremental index file every time, we first check if the new index
file would have at least as many commits as the parent file, and if it
will, we write a combined one instead. That should apply recursively,
so we'd have O(log n) index files.
The check for adding an existing commit to the index only checked if
the commit was already in the `MutableIndex`, not if it was already in
the parent `ReadonlyIndex`.
With tons of groundwork done, wee can now finally keep the index up to
date within a transaction! That means that we can start relying on the
index to always be valid, so we can use it e.g. for finding common
ancestors within a transaction. That should help speed up `jj evolve`
immensely on large repos.
We still don't write the updated index to disk when the transaction
closes. That will come later.
I'm about to move the functions from `CompositeIndex` to an new
`Index` trait implemeted by `ReadonlyIndex` and `MutableIndex`. Since
those types already implement `IndexSegment`, the names would conflict
and it would get annoying to have to disambiguate them. This commit
therefore prepares for that by adding a `segment_` prefix to the
functions in `IndexSegment`.
I want to keep the index updated within the transaction. I tried doing
that by adding a `trait Index`, implemented by `ReadonlyIndex` and
`MutableIndex`. However, `ReadonlyRepo::index` is of type
`Mutex<Option<Arc<IndexFile>>>` (because it is lazily initialized),
and we cannot get a `&dyn Index` that lives long enough to be returned
from a `Repo::index()` from that. It seems the best solution is to
instead create an `Index` enum (instead of a trait), with one readonly
and one mutable variant. This commit starts the migration to that
design by replacing the `Repo` trait by an enum. I never intended for
there there to be more implementations of `Repo` than `ReadonlyRepo`
and `MutableRepo` anyway.
This removes one level of indirection, which is nice because it was
visible to the callers. The `Index` struct is now empty. The next step
is obviously to delete it (and perhaps rename `IndexFile` to `Index`
or `ReadonlyIndex`).
