I don't know why these used to fail. Perhaps it was just that the
GitHub's Windows machines were not powerful to run them with 100
threads doing concurrent commits. Maybe they will pass now that we
limit the number of threads to the number of CPUs. This change enables
the tests so we can see what GitHub CI thinks.
This change teaches `Tree::diff()` to filter by a matcher. It only
filters the result so far; it does not restrict the tree walk to what
`Matcher::visit()` says is necessary yet. It also doesn't teach the
CLI to create a matcher and pass it in.
The two types have become very similar so it doesn't seem that there's
any point in having two types. We should probably do the same with
`ReadonlyEvolution` and `MutableEvolution`.
This patch makes it so we use color in the graph iff we use it other
output. We currently always use color except for in the smoke tests,
so it has no effect in practice. It's easy to turn off color when
stdout is redirected (using the `atty` crate), but I haven't done that
because I occasionally pipe `jj log` output to `less` and I want color
then.
This both helps find the current checkout and head operation and
hopefully helps teach the user that "@" is the symbol for the working
copy. I removed the current "<--" indication from the graph (and
non-graph) log template. Hopefully the "@" is clear enough on its own,
but we may want to add back some further indication later. We'll see.
I considered even changing the message to "Checking out: <commit>" as
that's technically more correct (the message is printed when the
view's checkout is updated, i.e. before the working copy is
updated). However, I worried that users would find it confusing that
e.g. `jj close` would result in a "Checking out: " message, even
though that's what actually happens.
I remember adding that message a long time ago so the user has a trace
of working copy commit ids in the terminal output. They should be able
to get the same information from the operation log combined with
e.g. `jj st --at-op`.
This patch makes it so we attempt to resolve a symbol as the
non-obsolete commits in a change id if all other resolutions
fail.
This addresses issue #15. I decided to not require any operator for
looking up by change id. I want to make it as easy as possible to use
change ids instead of commit ids to see how well it works to interact
mostly with change ids instead of commit ids (I'll try to test that by
using it myself).
The fact that the default change id in git repos is currently a prefix
of the commit id makes it impossible to use for resolving a prefix of
the change id to commits. This patch addresses that by reversing the
bits of the change id (relative to the commit id). The next patch will
make it so a change id (or a prefix thereof) is a valid revset.
I'd like to experiment with mostly using change ids instead of commit
ids on the CLI. Then it needs to be easy to refer to the non-obsolete
commits in a change, which means we probably don't want to require any
operators (i.e. a plain change id should resolve to the non-obsolete
commits in the change). This patch prepares for letting a change id
resolve to (possibly) many commits.
We already support using "@" to refer to the head operation when doing
e.g. `jj op undo -o @`. This patch adds support for `--at-op=@`. It
also makes that the default.
This prepares `jj status` for working better on an old repo state
(with `--at-op`). When looking at an old repo state, the "working
copy" should reflect the state from that state, i.e. the view's
"checkout", not the current working copy.
Before this patch, `jj log` would always commit the working copy and
most other commands would commit the working copy only if they were
passed a revset of exactly "@". This patch makes it so they all commit
the working copy unless they are passed just a symbol other than "@"
(typically a commit id). That means that we will not commit the
working copy if the user does `jj diff -r abc123`, but we will if they
do `jj diff -r :abc123`. It's clearly unnecessary in both those cases,
and we should fix, but this is probably good enough for now.
This patch adds checks in all (?) commands that rewrite commits to
make sure the commit they're about to rewrite is allowed to be
rewritten. The only check we do is that it's not a root commit. We
should at least add checks for public commits later.
Now that we auto-evolve after most operations, the user may not know
what "evolve" means. Even before that, the way `jj evolve` resolved
orphans after pruning was by rebasing them.
The project is starting to work well enough that I think it's time
that the documentation targets users instead of VCS hackers. This
patch rewrites much of the README to describe how the features help
the user instead of describing how they work. It also adds a tutorial.
Perhaps it makes more sense to display the working copy commit just
above the changes in the working copy commit, even though that means
that the order between the working copy commit and the parent becomes
the opposite of the order in `jj log`.
